Impressed by the achievements
being made in natural sciences, he
argued that there 3 discernible stages
in the evolution of human thought
1. Theological/ fictitious stage where
events are explained as God's work
2. 2nd stage was characteristics
of the middle ages with
explanations involving subtle
emissions from the divine and
mystic influences. Metaphysical
stage
3. Third stage that demonstrated that natural world is
subject to the rule of definite laws that can be
observed through exp. and the collection of positive
facts
He argued that these laws should not
be limited to the natural world , even
human society obeys laws of
behaviour and sociology will discover
these laws and become the queen of
all sciences. This positive stage
would be complete once all human
thought was based on science .
Positivism in sociology corresponds to the narrow definition of
science as quantifiable, generalisable and concerned to identify
clearly observable causes and correlation
Positivist sociology is similar to empiricism - it is mainly
interested in pursuing a research programms parrallel to the
natural sciences, seeking to discover patterned and regular
events in the social world whose occurrence is either caused
by another event or strongly correlated with that event.
structural sociology - concerened with the cause
of events at such a deep level that it may not be
observable - not possible to say one event
causes another
How successful and valid is "positivist" sociology?
1.Social science has not achieved anything
like the degree of certainty or ability to
predict if the natural sciences
2. Its methods are nothing like accurate - cannot use lab. exp. as
there are ethical prob. and artificial situation for people, they use
field exp. which are difficult to repeat . Therefore have greater
difficulty in establishing cause and effect, it lacks the precision of
natural science
Positivists point of view
What most sociologists is scientific
in that sociology constitutes a body of
organised data through systematic
enquiry, using techniques that
approximate to those of natural
science , yielding data of similar
reliability and validity
Good science is based on the hypothetico
-deductive method
The researcher must not allow their own
views/ prejudices to color any aspect of the
research programme. Otherwise the work
ceases to be scientific and becomes
corrupted and distorted.
The realist approach
A different view of science has emerged termed
as the realist, that argues that it is misleading to
typify science as being based on exp. and that
outside lab, sicentists are faced with as many
uncontrollable variable as social scientists.
Nor is it the case that scientists work
solely on the basis of observation.
They cannot see viruses spreading
or continents drifting apart, but they
are able to guess these facts. The
real causes are often knowable only
by their effects.
This the realists claim, allows
social scientists to claim that they
too are engaged in the same
scientific project where many and
complex variables are at work
The phenomenological approach
Whatever the claims of natural
science, there is a crucial diff. between
people and inanimate objects in that
humans think for themselves and have
reason for their beh., which enables
them to make active sense of this
world. Sociologist should be concerned
with interpreting this view. Whether
social causation exists is not relevant.
All knowledge is socially
constructed, its simply a product of
interaction between human beings. It
is more valid to analyse science as a
set of subjectively held meanings.