Goods displayed on the shelf ina self
service shop represent an invitation to
treat. An offer is only made when the
customer presents the goods at
checkout.
Invitation to treat
Invitation to 'make an offer'
Tender is classed as
an invitation to treat
Difference between offer an
invitation can be difficult to
distinguish but depends on
intention of parties
Carlil v Carbolic smoke ball
co (1892) (unilaberal offer)
Communication to offer
any method acceptable
Taylor v Laird 1856
Must be clear, unambigious
and capable of acceptance
Compare £495 to about £500
Offer remains open until
End of stated period
Death of offerer/ offeree
Until rejected
Withdrawn
Unless counter offer made
Revocation of offer
May be withdrawn at any
time prior to acceptance
Withdrawal must be
communicated
Must reach oferee prior to
acceptance
Byrne and Co V Van
Tienhoven 1880
Acceptance of offer
Must be communicated
Orally
Writing
Conduct
(Brogdon V
Metropolitan Rly
Co 1877)
Unqualified
assent to terms of
offer
Silence cannot amount
to acceptance
Felthouse v Binally 1862
Counter offers
If purpoted accepted, introduces new
terms or is different to offer, it becomes a
counter offer, this kills the original offer
Mirror image rule
Hyde V wrench (1840)
Request for info/ clarrification is not a counter
offer, so original offer remains and is open for
acceptance
Stevenson Jaques & co V Mclean 1880
Battle of the forms
Use of each parties
own standard terms
of business
Butler machine tool Co ltd V Ex-cell-O
Corp ltd (1979) (last shot doctrine)
Lord Denning MR: Found it most
cases where battle of the forms is used
that there is a contrast as soon as the
last of the forms is sent and recieved
without objection being taken to it.
Chistery Joinery ltd V John
Mowlem & co (1987)
Last shot wins
Acceptance
Acceptance is complete at the time a
letter of acceptance is posted
Adams V Lindsell 1818
Henthorn V Fraser 1872
Consideration
Essentials
Gives benifit to another or some
detriment from the other
Mutual exchange of promises
Price of each others promise
Need not to be adequate
May be money, Goods, services, work
done, or a promise not to sue
Characterised as factual benifit
or avoidance of factualdisbenifit
William V Roffey & Nicholls 1990
Past consideration
No consideration
You dug the garden for me
so I will buy you a beer
Executed consideration
Performed at the time of
making contract
Here is 50p in exchange for the
newspaper
Executory consideration
Performed in future
I promise to complete your
house by xmas next year
Performance of an existing duty
Stilk V Myrick
Williams V Roffey Brothers & Nichols
Part payment of a debt
Pinnels case
£8 10 S due nov 11
£5 2S paid oct 1
Foakes V Beer
Matter of interest
Intention to be bound
If all essentials exist, usual
inference is that intention exists
Execption is family arrangements
Legal capacity/ personal capacity
Execptions
Minor
Drunk
Insanity
Limit of power for corperations
e.g. public bodies
Particular form
Sale of land
Hire purchase
Contracts of guarentee
Contract terms
Categories of contract terms
Express terms
terms that have been specifically
stated and writeen down and agreed by
both parties involved in the contract
Written down
Orally agreed
Implied terms
Implied by custom
Implied by courts
In law
In fact
Implied by statute
Conditions
Warranties
Implied by Custom
Local custom
Hutton V Warren 1836
Agricultural lease
terminated by landlord
Custom that work done in tilling, sowing and
cultiuvation crops not yet harvested would be paid for
Not if express terms contracted custom
Implied by Court
Implied in fact
The moorcock 1889
Mooring/ low tide/ grounded/ damage
Moor owner done nothing to
assertain whether river bed
adjacent was suitable
Such a term was implied to
give business efficacy to the
contract
Shirlaw V southern foundries 1939
Officious bystander test
Something thats so obvious it
goes without saying
Implied in law
Liverpool city council V Irwin 1977
Lord Salmon found the landlord in no legal
duty to keep the lifts working and the staircase
lit
Test is a necessity not reasonableness
Construction examples
Drake & Skull V Higgs & Hill (1995)
Agreement of all matters except
daywork rates
Contract with implied term that the
sub contractor would be paid a
reasonable sum
Mitsui Babcock Energy V
John Brown Engineering
(1996)
Failure to agree tests & liquidated damages
Made a coherant & Workable contract
Implied by Statute
Examples
Sale of Goods act 1979
Supply of goods and services act 1982
Building Act 1984
HGCRA 1996
DDM 2007
Sale of goods act 1979
S.13/ Goods must corespond
with their descriptions
S.14/ (2) Satisfactory quality
S.14/ (3) Fit for particular purpose
S.15/ Sale by sample
bulk of goods/ corresopond
with sample
Defect free not aparant/
reasonable examination
S.12/ Seller must have title to goods
Supply of goods and
services act 1982
S.2/ Implied warranty as to title
S.4/ Implied term as to quality or fitness
S.12/ Contract for the supply of a service
S.13/ Reasonable care and skill
S.14/ Carry out service within a
reasonable time
S.15/ Pay a reasonable charge
Contracts for work &
materials
Young & Martin V
Mcmanus Childs (1969)
Roofing tiles selected by
employers
Suitable warranties, adapted to
the nature of contract should be
applied in contracts where mixed
elements of supply/ goods/ work
to be done
Title to goods
Aluminium industries V Romalpa (1976)
Court of appeal upheld a clause which
prevented the passing of property in
goods until paid for
Quicquick plantitur solo solo credit
Some perculiarities within
construction contracts
Sale of dwellings
National house building council (NHBC)
Defective premises act 1972
Workmanlike or
proffessinal manner
Proper materials
Fit for habitation
Housing act 2004
Vendor to provide
energy performance
certificate
Time for performance
Time of the essence
cannot be implied
Needs to be
express terms
Time for completion can be stipulated
in construction contract although no
normally an essential element