Severe physical disturbance of
seabed. Physical effects seen for
up to 7 years after dredging
ceased (at a moderate energy site)
Weathered dredge tracks - marks on seafloor
Indirect - sediment resuspension.
3 ways;
Plumes of suspended
material from action of
dredge head itself -
underwater
Outwash of material
from spillways from
vessel generate much
more
Rejection of unwanted sediment
These 2 are termed "surface plumes"
Extent depends
on particle size,
volume, speed of
discharge and
local
hydrodynamics
Impact depends on habitat type
Levels of natural disturbance high with
high levels of suspended sediment due
to waves and tidal action - less impact
Low levels of natural disturbance - more significant
Encrusting epifaunal taxa affected
by abrasive action of suspended
sedimenst
Sand particles usually within few
100m, finer particles transported much
greater distances from point of
discharge
Indirect impacts
may be more
important than
direct impacts
Results in reduced set
of species, low
densities, reduced
biomass
21% of the sand
and gravel used in
England and
Wales is extracted
from the marine
environment
Extracted using huge ships - in
UK usually trailer dredging,
sometimes static suction hopper
dredging
Useful materials are washed
and screened, rest thrown
back overboard
Removal of habitat
Immediate loss of
fauna in extraction
area
Changes in sediment
composition, associated
communities change
Organisms associated with certain
sediment types/particle size. Warwick &
Uncles 1980 - Severn Estuary
Different faunal composition of silty sand to coarser sand
Increase in the proportion
of fine sands on increase in
gravel
Full restoration of fauna and sediments can
take 2-3 years from cessation of dredging -
short term dredge areas
But in UK most licences 15 years
Long term effects not
known but areas
around UK still not
recovered after 7
years
Recovery often only
assessed on parameters
of biomass, abundance
and diversity
But restructuring of
biomass dominants and
age structures could take
longer than other
community attributes,
perhaps 15-20 years
(Newell et al. 2004)
Study by Newell et al. 2004
Studied impacts of
dredged sites,
surrounding areas
and axis of transport
of discharged
materials
Impacts on
bathymetry and
sediment
composition
Significant
differences in
sediments in
heavily and lightly
dredged sites
Benthic communities
significantly different
between dredged and
undredged sites
Major suppression of of species
humbers, population density,
biomass and average body size
Decreased
"equilibrium"
species such as
bivalves and
echinoderms
More "opportunistic" species well adapted to disturbed sediments
An impoverished community dominated by polycheates
A "footprint" of the
impacts of dredging and
screening in surrounding
areas
Majority of sediments
settle within 500m but
evidence of 2k
"Footprint" can extend 2-3km along axis of
net sediment transport
Distance
depends
on net
sediment
transport
at the
seabed
Areas near dredging site may be of
conservation significance or important nursery
and feeding grounds for commerically valuable
species such as the Queen Scallop
(Aequipecten opercularis) and edible crab
(Cancer pagurus)
Suggested Mitigation Measures
Reduction of overboard screening; material
accumulates at dredge site, means more
dredging and more discharge required in the
exploited area over time
Adjustment of time for exploitation; dredging only when
tidal stream will carry sediments away
Establishment of refuge areas to enhance
recolonisation; non-dredged areas left between
areas of dredged seabed.
Measures need to be cost-effective to
really be implemented