Sales and profits fall due to decreased demand
because of technologic and consumer-taste
changes
Products may be
withdrawn
Less promotion and product
development expenses
Advertising as a
defence from
rivals
Sales peak and flatten
due to market
saturation
Product improvements, advertising
and sales promotional offers,
dealer discounts and price cutting
Need for effective brand
building to fight off
competitors
Faster sales and profit
growth
Profits may devline towards the ends of the stage
because the rivals enter the attractive market
At the end of the stage
weaker suppliers leave the
market
Low sales growth, losses because of
heavy development and promotional
costs
Companies will be monitoring the
speed of product adoption and, if
this is disappointing, may
terminate the product at this
stage
Uses
Product termination
Nothing lasts
forever
Old products have to
be terminated and
new ones developed
Danger of being too fond
of a product to terminate
it
Growth projections
The growth stage (increasing sales
and profits) won't alst forever
Caution with investing in
new production facilities
Marketing objectives and
strategies over the PLC
Market objectives and
strategies should change
along with the change in
the market and
competitive conditions
during the PLC
During Decline
Industry revitalization
strategy
When decline is caused by lack of investment.
So increase investment and revitalize the
industry
Profitable survivor strategy
Become the sole survivor in a dying market by: further
reducing the attractiveness of the market (price cuts,
increase in promotional expenditure); buying the competitors
or their product lines; agreeing to take over competitors'
contracts (e.g. supplying spare parts or service contracts) in
exchange from their dropping out of the market
Product planning
Balancing the product range -
different products should be in
different PLC stages to ensure
company sustainability
The dangers of overpowering
When a new-to-the-world product enters the
market and is a huge success, the invetor
reaps a lot of benefits. PLC predicts the rise
of competition in the growth stage so the
inventor should prepare by securing patents
Limitations
Fads and classics
Fads' PLC is like a spike. Classics seem
to be in the maternity stage forever
Marketing effects
PLC is the result of marketing activities not the cause
Using the PLC may lead to the inappropriate action when
the correct response should be increased marketing support
Annotations:
Examples:
Inappropriate action - harvesting or dropping the product
Correct response - product replacement, positioning reinforcement or repositioning
Unpredictability
The duration of the stages is unpredictable
Limits the use of PLC as a forecasting tool
Misleading objective and strategy prescriptions
Other possible startegies: harvest during Growth (e.g. due to
intense competition), build during Maturity (e.g. when a distinct,
defensive differential advantage can be developed), build during
Decline (e.e. when there is an opportunity to dominate)
Managing Brand and
Product Line Portfolios
Companies must decide how to distribute their limited
resources among the competing needs of products so as to
achieve the best performance for the company as a whole
Portfolio planning
The process of managing groups
of brands and product lines
Making decisions on which
brands/product lines to
build, hold, harvest or divest
Methods for product management
The Boston Consulting Group
growth-share matrix
Stars
Market leaders, profitable,
need to be protected
Problem children
Likely unprofitable
Cash cows
Leaders in mature
markets, profitable,
minimal investment
in production facilities,
should be defended
Dogs
Likely unprofitable,
in mature or
declining markets
Cash dogs
Between cash
cows and dogs
Market growth rate is a proxy for
market attractiveness. Market
share is a proxy for competitive
strength (above 1 means our
share > the biggest competitor)
This model has many limitations
General Electric market attractiveness -
competitive position model
Uses more criteria to determine
market attractiveness and
competitive strenght more accurately
It's harder to use than the Boston
Box, and its flexibility can provide
an opportunity for managerial bias
Richer analysis leading to better
resource allocation decisions
Contribution of product
portfolio planning
The models emphasize that different products have
different roles and should be treated differently
Different strategic objectives call fo different
reward systems and different types of manager