we value art for its expressive
qualities - art must involve the
expression of an emotion
art does not reflect
the outer world but
the inner world of the
consciousness and
the self
Jackson Pollock's The Enchanted Forest
Romantics
the purpose of the artist is to
uncover his emotions and
express them in art
it does not matter how
accurately an artist
responds to his
surroundings
what matters is how the artist
emotionally responds to their
surroundings
Wallis' The Death of Chatterton
expresses pain and suffering without the
audience knowing who the subject is
the difference between art and a
facial expression or a greetings card
is that the work of art projects a
highly subjective, individualised
emotion that has been felt by the
artist
Tolstoy
purpose of art is not to produce beauty, provide
pleasure or communicate ideas, but to
communicate feelings
for art to be successful the
audience must receive the same
emotional feelings as the artist.
therefore value is placed in
the hands of the audience
reaction
the feelings expressed in art should be of a moral
nature and enlighten us emotionally about the
human condition
Religious art promotes harmony and understanding between human beings
art must be universally accessible
art such as Shakespeare's plays are
purely about upper class love, power
struggles etc. not relevant to majority of
the audience
Tolstoy rates Dickens much
higher because he
expresses universal
emotions
we can understand and appreciate
art without the need for knowledge
of the history
Objections to Tolstoy
disregards a lot of art that is appreciated
considers some feelings superior to others
feelings of a moral and religious
nature are seen as more
appropriate and valuable then
feelings representing immorality
Tracey Emin's art would be considered counterfeit
Kant argued that moral and
aesthetic judgments should be
completely differentiated
rates horror films because they invoke strong audience reaction