Originated in the 1970's, particularly by
James Q. Wilson, and Ernst van den Haag
(1975)
It developed as a critique of
sociological theory which had
failed to solve the problem of
crime.
The basis of Right Realism is a
negative view of human nature,
and suggests that people are
naturally selfish and greedy.
Solutions to crime
Rational choice
theory
Developed by
Clarke and Coleman
(1980)
The theory argues that
criminals will engage in
crime if the benefits
outweigh the costs.
Increase the costs of crime (increase
the likelihood of being caught and
tougher punishments).
Crime control should also fall upon
members of the community. For
example, neighbourhood watch.
This involves responsible parenting and
'active citizens' who challenge anti-social
behaviour
Tough punishment: heavy fines,
sentences and advocation of corporal
(physical) and capital punishment.
Theories to crime
With increased rates of
affluence, crime rates
have soared.
Key factors to crime increase -
Lack of discipline in education,
decline in the traditional
family
Rising crime levels reflects ineffective and
inadequate social control. Permissive attitudes
allow self-indulgent and anti-social behaviour.
Feckless parenting (lacking initiative), absent
fathers, lack of discipline in schools, and liberal
policies of the state have all served to begin to
ferment crime, and leading to incivilities.
The non-traditional family, especially single
mothers, is viewed as a major factor
Lack of discipline in schools, a mass media that glamorises deviance and
crime and the decline in the influence of religious values are other
important contributory factors.
Also known as the
new right
James Q. Wilson and the 'Broken
Window Thesis'
"Unless ‘incivilities’ (litter, graffiti, noise
levels, vandalism, etc.) are kept
minimal, then wider anti-social
behaviour and more serious crimes will
follow"
He advocates that the police adopt a
policy of ‘zero-tolerance’ for even
minor crimes (as tried by the Mayor
of New York).
This reflects Emile Durkheim’s
idea that local informal
controls are crucial for law
and order and A.H. Bottoms’
concept of the ‘tipping’ of
problem housing estates.
James Q. Wilson (1975)
Wilson argues that there are three key
factors affecting long time crime.
1. Number of young
males (typical deviants).
2. Cost/benefits of
crime: Rational choice
theory
3. Inadequate
socialisation into norms
and values.
To deal with this he advocates target hardening of
deviant groups and areas through pro-active policing.
Right Realists blame crime on inadequate or
inappropriate socialisation by key
socialisation agencies in society.
Charles Murray
He views the underclass as prone to:
criminal tendencies, violence,
illegitimacy and promiscuity,
educational failure and welfare
dependency.
He argues the underclass are
particularly insufficiently
integrated into society’s
norms and values. He calls the
deviant subcultural values of
the underclass as
‘paternalism’.
Van den Haag (1975)
He adopts a very poor view of humanity as
willing to cheat to ‘get on’ and therefore some
groups need to be controlled for their own
good and that of society.
Therefore, he argues, it is reasonable
for law and order agencies to target the
poor
He advocates a tough penal system of
punishment: corporal and capital.
Like Durkheim, he
sees punishment as
functional, acting as a
deterrent.
Critique of Right realism
It is influential on Government
policy in both the USA and the UK
For example 'zero tolerance' has
succesfully been adopted as a policy in
New York
Some argue it is a lack of investment in deprived
areas rather than incivilities tat cause crime
Another argument is that
where zero tolerance is
introduced, this simply shifts
crime to other areas.
It is easy to pick on scapegoats,
such as single parent families.
Marxists argue that concentration on minor
offences means that more serious crime gets
ignored by the authorities.