null
US
Sign In
Sign Up for Free
Sign Up
We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. The dynamic nature of our site means that Javascript must be enabled to function properly. Please read our
terms and conditions
for more information.
Next up
Copy and Edit
You need to log in to complete this action!
Register for Free
95148
BEVERIDGE v's NEW RIGHT
Description
UNIT 21 Mind Map on BEVERIDGE v's NEW RIGHT, created by Jen Collins on 17/05/2013.
No tags specified
unit 21
unit 21
Mind Map by
Jen Collins
, updated more than 1 year ago
More
Less
Created by
Jen Collins
over 11 years ago
81
3
0
Resource summary
BEVERIDGE v's NEW RIGHT
new right supporters
argued Beveridge failed to take following into account
outcomes and costs
failed to pay attention to economy, effectivness and efficiency
took the service user out of the driving seat
beveridge reforms were inflexible and limited provided limited choice to the service user
Paul Wilding and Vic George
Beveridge supporters
argued that
Money that could be used for care would be poured into setting up new systems and private profit
care work would be pushed back onto unpaid carers
in an attempt to win contracts private companies would cut costs to undercut other bids. This would result in staff wage cuts
thinking of people who needed care as customers who could exercise choice was inappropriate
Show full summary
Hide full summary
Want to create your own
Mind Maps
for
free
with GoConqr?
Learn more
.
Similar
UNIT 21 CHAPTER 3 NEW N.H.S 1948-1979 AND CHA PTER 4 SOCIAL CARE
Louise Carey
UNIT 21- legislations between 1944 + 1949
Louise Carey
Beveridge report
Charlie_eeyore
The Vision: an all-inclusive welfare state
Charlie_eeyore
UNIT 21 CHAPTER 1
Louise Carey
WELFARE STATE: POST WW 2 (1936-45) BEVERIDGE
Jen Collins
THATCHERISM: The New Right, anti-collectivist 1979-1990
Jen Collins
UNIT 21 CHAPTER 2
Louise Carey
Seebohm Report 1968
Jen Collins
1st GIANT EVIL:WANT
Jen Collins
5th EVIL: SQUALOR
Jen Collins
Browse Library