Criado por catriona.lilley
mais de 11 anos atrás
|
||
Questão | Responda |
Caldwell | Objective recklessness |
Cunningham | Subjective recklessness test established: D sees risk and the risk is an unreasonable one to take. |
Hancock | degree of probability of death is important in determining manslaughter or murder (i.e. intent or recklessness) |
Hardie | No presumption of recklessness if D takes non-dangerous drugs |
Hyam | Foresight of consequence is not the same as intention but it is evidence from which the jury can infer intent |
Matthews | Woollin not followed- assumed that this required virtual certainty in fact and the defendant's awareness of this fact |
Nedrick | Development of the law on oblique intention- the Woollin test followed this |
R v G and R | Caldwell was the wrong test for recklessness- a subjective test should be used i.e. D aware of risk. This would not apply when D was voluntarily intoxicated |
Mohan | Intent is the only possible MR for attempts |
Moloney | The judge should not seek to elaborate on the meaning of intent. It should be given its normal meaning by the jury. Foresight of consequences does not necessarily infer intent (Woollin) |
Quer criar seus próprios Flashcards gratuitos com GoConqr? Saiba mais.