Moray (1959) - Auditory Attention

Descrição

ALEVEL PSYCHOLOGY FlashCards sobre Moray (1959) - Auditory Attention, criado por Dhara Bechra em 06-05-2017.
Dhara Bechra
FlashCards por Dhara Bechra, atualizado more than 1 year ago
Dhara Bechra
Criado por Dhara Bechra aproximadamente 7 anos atrás
53
2

Resumo de Recurso

Questão Responda
Moray (1959) - Auditory Attention Cherry's (1953) method of 'shadowing' found pp's who shadowed a message presented to one ear were ignorant of the content of the other message simultaneously presented to the other ear. Moray tested Cherry's findings.
Aims & Research Questions Find out whether pp's can remember content of messages presented to 'non-attended' ear in dichotic listening task- pp's asked to shadow content from one ear. To test factors that would enable unattended, dichotically presented message to be noticed.
Research Method 3 Lab Experiments: 2 Repeated Measures Design 1 Independent Measures Design Experiment 1: DV- memory of words, IV- repeated word list and controlled word list.
Research Method (2) Experiment 2: DV- whether pp heard instruction, IV- name included or not in instructions. Experiment 3: DV- number of digits reported, IV- whether they should shadow the message or remember the numbers.
Sample Male and Female Undergraduates and researchers. Study 1: No. of Pp's not recorded Study 2: 12 participants Study 3: 2 groups of 14
Procedure Pp's practice shadowing passage spoken 150 words a minute. Exp 1: short list of simple words presented 35 times (repeated) to one ear of pp while they shadowed a prose message presented to other ear. After 30 secs, pp asked to recall words presented in non-atteneded message.
Procedure (2) Exp 2: pp's asked to shadow 10 short passages of fiction. Instructions such as 'listen to right ear- you'll receive instructions to change ears' given at start of passages. In 6 passages, instructions given within passage such as 'change your ear' and half of instructions were prefaced by pp's name.
Procedure (3) Exp 3: 2 groups of 14 shadowed 1 of 2 simultaneous dichotic messages. In some, towards end of message, numbers were included, sometimes in 1 or both. 1 group told they would be asked q's about content and other group asked to remember as many numbers as they could.
Results Exp 1: when short list of simple words presented as non-attended message there was no trace of words being remembered even when presented many times.
Results (2) Exp 2: when instruction was given in non-attended message, pp's heard 20 of the 39 times when the instruction included their name, but only heard 4 of the 36 when the instruction didn't include their name in it.
Results (3) Exp 3: there was no significant difference in the number of digits recalled in either condition.
Conclusion In situation where pp pays attention to a message presented in one ear and rejects the other, almost none of the rejected message is able to penetrate through attention block.
Conclusion (2) Subjectively important messages such as your name can penetrate the attention block so that a person will hear instructions if it has their name in it. Difficult to make neutral material such as numbers, important enough to break through block set up in dichotic shadowing.
Evaluation Lab experiment- reduces extraneous variables- higher validity Quantitative data collected High EV- materials they used resembled real life settings Replicable- procedure was standardised

Semelhante

History of Psychology
mia.rigby
Biological Psychology - Stress
Gurdev Manchanda
Psychology subject map
Jake Pickup
Bowlby's Theory of Attachment
Jessica Phillips
Psychology A1
Ellie Hughes
Memory Key words
Sammy :P
Psychology | Unit 4 | Addiction - Explanations
showmestarlight
The Biological Approach to Psychology
Gabby Wood
Chapter 5: Short-term and Working Memory
krupa8711
Cognitive Psychology - Capacity and encoding
T W
The working memory model
Lada Zhdanova