Evaluation: Personality as an Explanation of Crime
Descrição
A level Psychology (Criminal Psychology) Mapa Mental sobre Evaluation: Personality as an Explanation of Crime, criado por Katie Greensted em 27-05-2019.
Evaluation: Personality as an
Explanation of Crime
Eyesenck's theory of the criminal
personality suggested that it is
possible to measure personality
along two dimensions:
extraversion-introversion, and
neuroticism-stability.
Extraverts crave excitement and
stimulation, and because of this may
be more likely to engage in risk-taking,
dangerous behaviour. They also tend
to not condition easily and do not
learn from their mistakes, making the
likelihood of recidivism higher.
People who are more neurotic are
more nervy and anxious. This
emotional instability makes them
more difficult to predict, and could
make criminal and anti-social
behaviour more likely due to their
impulsivity.
Eyesenck's theory has been criticised for being too simplistic and
deterministic, as it suggests that there is only one type of criminal
personality. More recent models, such as the five-factor model (Digman),
accepts Eyesenck's idea of extraversion and introversion, but adds other
aspects including openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness. Low
levels of agreeableness and conscientiousness have been related to
offending behaviours. Other researchers challenge Eyesenck's theory by
suggesting that impulsivity is a better predictor of anti-social and criminal
behaviour. This research suggests that criminal personality may be more
complex than Eyesenck first suggested.
Eyesenck's theory is essential biological in
nature. The personality traits we develop can
be explained by the type of nervous system
we inherit. The constant need for excitement
that extraverts experience is due to them
having an underactive nervous system, as it
requires an unusual amount of arousal.
Similarly, individuals who score highly on
neuroticism react strongly to situations that
others would find less stressful, or even
neutral.
There is evidence to suggest that the criminal personality is
related to the activity of the nervous system. Raine found that
those with a criminal record later in life recorded more signs of
under-arousal of the nervous system when they were aged 15,
such as lower resting heart rates, than those without a criminal
record. This suggests there is a link between biological factors and
offending, although research has pointed out that a lot of social
variables also have an influence in predicting criminal behaviour.
In his later writings, Eyesenck added in
another dimension to his theory -
psychoticism. This was less clear in
relation to its connections to the nervous
system, however it suggested that
psychotic individuals were self-centred,
cold and lacking in empathy towards
others.
Therefore, the criminal type is
characterised as a person who scores
highly on all dimensions - extraversion,
neuroticism and psychoticism. A
personality inventory was developed,
which was a questionnaire which helped
place people along the dimensions to
determine a personality type.
There is a lot of supporting evidence to support the idea of a
criminal personality. Boduszek found that among a group of
violent and non-violent reoffenders in a high security prison, a
criminal thinking 'style' correlated with high levels of
psychoticism, extraversion and neuroticism. This suggests that
Eyesenck's theory has validity as there is empirical evidence
suggesting there is a link between personality and
offending/reoffending.
However, Farrington et al found very little
evidence that the questionnaire Eyesenck
developed was an adequate measure of
predicting offending, both in juveniles and in
adults. This suggests that Eyesenck's theory
about the criminal personality may lack validity.
Despite the biological basis to the theory, Eyesenck did
acknowledge the importance of the socialisation process in
childhood in determining whether someone will be
law-abiding or not. However, the fact that extraverts are
natural reward seekers makes them less receptive to
operant conditioning and therefore less affected by
punishments for wrongdoings. Similarly, neurotics have less
efficient learning which may relate to a difficulty in taking on
board social rules. This may make extravert-neurotics more
likely to behave in an anti-social way.
Eyesenck's theory could lead to practical implications in preventing
crime. The theory suggests that criminal tendencies, like responding less
to conditioning and not learning from their own mistakes, could be
identified early in childhood. This could lead to intervention which could
modify the socialisation experiences of high-risk individuals in order to
prevent them from becoming offenders. This suggests that Eyesenck's
theory could be beneficial in reducing criminal and anti-social behaviour
through early interventions at school or home.