Arbitrary system of
symbols to transmit
and understand an
infinite variety of
messages (Brown, 1965)
For shared, intended
communication (Bancroft, 1995)
Spoken sounds are
used to encode
meaning (Barrett, 1999)
People must be conventional
(use language the way
everyone uses it) and creative
(tailor to circumstances)
(Tomasello, 2000)
Pre-Linguistic Development
Infants are well prepared
to acquire language
Have pre-wired
abilities (e.g. attending
to people over objects)
Are born with a
sensitivity to language
Attend to speech in
preference to other
sounds
Can discriminate
phonemes in all languages
Can recognise mother's
voice and language at birth
Can recognise
familiar from
unfamiliar
utterances
Key Components of
Language Development
1) Phonological
Development
Phonology: rules
governing speech sounds
Cooing (2 months) -
consonants are added and
babbling begins (6 months)
- first words (12 months)
Limitations of the
vocal apparatus not
being fully developed
Not necessarily
limitations with
cognition
(Ingram, 1986)
Mostly
completed
by school
age
3) Grammatical
Development
Rules governing
how words are
built from
morphemes and
how words are
combined
Syntax (to create
well-formed sentences)
requires more than
one-word utterances
Telegraphic speech emerges at 1-3 years - focus on
high content words showing grammatical ability (word
order) but not using small words/ morphemes (e.g. 'ed')
Sentences
appear at
around 2-3
years
Show correct
subject-verb-object
order
Grammatical morphemes are
added (sometimes with errors
e.g. overregularisation)
Complexity of
grammatical structures
steadily increases with age
2) Semantic
Development
The meaning encoded
by language
Young infants
learn 1-3 words per
month (quite slow)
12 months: typically
holophrases (can
usually comprehend
more than they can
produce)
18 months: words
are learnt more
rapidly, usually 14
words per month
('explosion' in ability)
Development usually parallels ability
to categorise objects at their basic level
4) Pragmatic
development
Rules governing
how language is
used in a given
context
Conversational
turn-taking is
mastered at 12
months
Games like 'peek-a-boo'
appear as child can
actively maintain flow
Rules of
successful
interaction
start to
appear during
pre-school
years
Children adapt
their speech to
the listener during
middle childhood
Become more skilled to
judge others' knowledge (e.g.
using Theory of Mind skills)
Children must acquire skill
in each of the 4 components
with certain skills being
more innate than others
Theories of
Language
Development
Behaviourist
Theory
Language is learnt via
operant conditioning -
adults reinforce babbling to
shape sound and usage of
words in the correct context
Reinforcement can
include parental
approval/ attention
but may not always
be explicit
Imitation AND
reinforcement
In Favour:
Imitation and reinforcement are
sound principles in the lab etc
Explain why children learn
local languages/ dialect
Infants do imitate adult's speech
(Papousek & Papousek, 1989)
Adult speech quality
affects child's learning
- children with mothers
who talk a lot have
children with larger
vocabularies
(Clarke-Stewart, 1973)
Limitations:
Does not explain grammatical errors
e.g. overregularisation (Pinker, 1995)
Brown (1969) found that
mothers corrected content
more than grammar
Reinforcement doesn't seem to
be a practical explanation for
the high rate of learning and the
capability of complex sentences
Nativist Theory
Proposed an innate capacity
for language acquisition
Suggested that humans
possess an innate Language
Acquisition Device (LAD)
The LAD detect
statistical regularities
in speech and forms
hypotheses about them
The LAD then accepts
or rejects the
hypotheses accordingly
Embodies rules of
universal grammar
Humans are capable
of learning any
language this way
Sentences have surface structure and
deep structure (the LAD processes the
surface structure to obtain meaning)
Surface structure:
words and word order
Deep structure: meaning
Grammatical rules of deep structure are
shared by all languages ('universal grammar')
Rules of universal grammar are
innate and embodied in the LAD
In favour:
There is language
across all cultures
Children go through the same stages
of development of all languages
Languages share universal
features (e.g. verbs and nouns)
Bickerton, 1990:
immigrants
develop pidgin
language to
communicate (with
no consistent word
order) - they
developed a highly
grammatical creole
language - argued
that the children
possess a genetic
programme for
language
Specific brain areas
have localised
language function
Limitations:
A single set of rules
governing all languages has
not yet been identified
Does not acknowledge
the importance of
cognitive development
Ignore effects
of social
experience
Cognitivist Theory
A child's cognition is
built from sensorimotor
experience - children
develop schemas for
objects and events
Cognition
precedes
language
Before age 2,
schemas
represent
sensorimotor
experience
After age 2, the child
becomes capable of
symbolic thought -
language grows from
broader cognitive
capabilities
Rules are required from
and reflect the child's
knowledge of the world
Linguistic ability reflects the child's
stage of cognitive development
Children of a particular age
have had similar experiences
and similar cognitions in a
similar order and therefore
are alike in linguistic ability
The 'Cognition Hypothesis'
(Cromer, 1974) states that
children understand and use
particular linguistic structures,
only when their cognitive
abilities enable them
In favour:
Language emerges after object
permanence is achieved (taken
as evidence for symbolic
thought - cognitive capability)
E.g. phrases such as "all gone" only
occur after object permenance
Children's first
words are usually
familiar entities
(using knowledge
of the world
through
sensorimotor
experience)
Limitations:
Ignores the
importance of social
influence on learning
Viewed children as 'little
scientists' - learning in a
solitary way and ignoring
the social influence
around them
Social Interactionist
Theory
Infants first learn about the
social world which provides
a basis for language
The Language Acquisition
Support System (LASS) is
used to the explain the
social processing
underpinning language
The LASS refers to the
importance of the child's
social support network -
works in conjunction
with innate mechanisms
to acquire language
Led to a 'spiral curriculum'
which supports gradual
exposure to complex topics
- the way children learn
language
Parents tend to assign
meaning the children's
utterances from
around 3 months
The child plays a
role in maintaining
the flow in
conversational
turn-taking from
around 12 months
From 6 months, the child
will follow the mother's gaze
(focusing of joint attention),
allowing for communication
about an object
Around 9
months, the
child uses
gestures during
joint
communication
In favour:
Supports the
importance of
non-verbal social
behaviours
Can explain poor
language skills when
children are raised with
little, poor, or no social
interaction
Differences in the LASS are
thought to explain differences in LA
Limitations:
It is not clear
how it explains
development of
grammar
Ignores
fundamental
perceptual
and cognitive
processes in
language
acquisition