Originated in the 1970's, particularly by
James Q. Wilson, and Ernst van den Haag
(1975)
It developed as a critique
of sociological theory which
had failed to solve the
problem of crime.
The basis of Right Realism is
a negative view of human
nature, and suggests that
people are naturally selfish
and greedy.
Solutions to crime
Rational choice
theory
Developed by
Clarke and Coleman
(1980)
The theory argues that
criminals will engage in
crime if the benefits
outweigh the costs.
Increase the costs of crime
(increase the likelihood of being
caught and tougher punishments).
Crime control should also fall
upon members of the community.
For example, neighbourhood
watch.
This involves responsible parenting and
'active citizens' who challenge anti-social
behaviour
Tough punishment: heavy fines,
sentences and advocation of
corporal (physical) and capital
punishment.
Theories to crime
With increased rates
of affluence, crime
rates have soared.
Key factors to crime
increase - Lack of discipline
in education, decline in the
traditional family
Rising crime levels reflects ineffective and
inadequate social control. Permissive
attitudes allow self-indulgent and anti-social
behaviour.
Feckless parenting (lacking initiative), absent
fathers, lack of discipline in schools, and liberal
policies of the state have all served to begin to
ferment crime, and leading to incivilities.
The non-traditional family, especially
single mothers, is viewed as a major
factor
Lack of discipline in schools, a mass media
that glamorises deviance and crime and
the decline in the influence of religious
values are other important contributory
factors.
Also known as the new right
James Q. Wilson and the 'Broken
Window Thesis'
"Unless ‘incivilities’ (litter, graffiti,
noise levels, vandalism, etc.) are
kept minimal, then wider
anti-social behaviour and more
serious crimes will follow"
He advocates that the police
adopt a policy of
‘zero-tolerance’ for even minor
crimes (as tried by the Mayor of
New York).
This reflects Emile Durkheim’s
idea that local informal
controls are crucial for law
and order and A.H. Bottoms’
concept of the ‘tipping’ of
problem housing estates.
James Q. Wilson (1975)
Wilson argues that there are
three key factors affecting long
time crime.
1. Number of young
males (typical deviants).
2. Cost/benefits of
crime: Rational choice
theory
3. Inadequate
socialisation into
norms and values.
To deal with this he advocates target hardening of deviant
groups and areas through pro-active policing.
Right Realists blame crime on
inadequate or inappropriate
socialisation by key socialisation
agencies in society.
Charles Murray
He argues the underclass are
particularly insufficiently
integrated into society’s norms
and values. He calls the deviant
subcultural values of the
underclass as ‘paternalism’.
He views the underclass as
prone to: criminal tendencies,
violence, illegitimacy and
promiscuity, educational
failure and welfare
dependency.
Van den Haag (1975)
He adopts a very poor view of humanity
as willing to cheat to ‘get on’ and
therefore some groups need to be
controlled for their own good and that of
society.
Therefore, he argues, it is
reasonable for law and order
agencies to target the poor
He advocates a tough penal system of
punishment: corporal and capital.
Like Durkheim, he
sees punishment as
functional, acting as a
deterrent.
Critique of Right realism
It is influential on Government
policy in both the USA and the
UK
For example 'zero tolerance' has succesfully been adopted
as a policy in New York
Some argue it is a lack of investment in
deprived areas rather than incivilities tat
cause crime
Another argument is that where
zero tolerance is introduced, this
simply shifts crime to other areas.
It is easy to pick on
scapegoats, such as single
parent families.
Marxists argue that concentration on minor
offences means that more serious crime gets
ignored by the authorities.