Originated in 1970s by James Q Wilson and Ernst Van Den Haag
It was developed as a critique of
sociological theory which failed to
solve crime.
Negative view of human nature
(People are naturally selfish and
greedy)
Human nature
needs social control
and have
appropriate
behaviour
Van den Haag argues it is reasonable
for law and order agencies to target the
poor
Right Realists
Believe the solution to crime is the Rational Choice Theory
Rational Choice Theory
Developed in Clarke and
Coleman (1980)
Argues that criminals will commit crime if
the benefits outweigh the costs
Solution is to increase the costs of crime (tougher punishment)
Anti-Sociological criminology
Right Realists oppose the
connection between crime
and poverty.
They point out that wealth and crime rates have rising.
Key Factors behind
crime increase.
Extending the Welfare State
Lack of discipline in education
Decline in traditional family types
Selfish Human Nature
Rising crime levels reflect inadequate social control
Permissive attitudes allow self
indulgent and anti-social behaviout
The result of this has caused
crime like: muggings, graffiti,
theft and car break-ins.
Lacking parenting, absent fathers, lack of discipline in
schools, cause this behaviour
Solutions to Crime
Reduce opportunities for offending.
Increase punishments
Heavy fines,sentences and Capital punishment
Crime control should fall upon members
of the community
Responsible parenting
'Broken Window Thesis'
James Q. Wilson argues that
unless small crime like littering are
kept minimal then more anti-social
behaviour and serious crime will
happen.
Argues 3 factors affecting long term crime
Number of young males
Costs/benefits of crime
Inadequate socialisation into norms/values
He says that police
should adopt a
'zero-tolerance'
policy for even small
crimes.
Emile Durkhiem's idea that local informal
controls are crucial for law and order
Charles Murray argues
that underclass are not
integrated into society's
norms and values.
He calls deviant subcultural values
of the underclass as 'paternaslism'.
Critique of Right Realism
Infulential on Government policy in USA & UK
For example 'zero-tolerance' adopted in New York
Some argue it is a lack of investment in deprived areas than incivilities that cause crime to rise.
Easy to pick on scapegoats like single parent families.
Marxist argue that concentrating on minor crimes than more serious crimes get ignored by authorities.
zero-tolerance will shift crime to other areas.
Left Realism
Lea and Young developed left realism in response of right realism.
Sees crime as a real problem for
ordinary people
Argues that rising crime rate cannot be
explained by the unreliability of social crime
statistics.
Focus on victims as well as offenders,
recongnisng crime is mostly in the inner-city
and housing estates.
Ethnicity and Crime
Lea and Young accepted that there is a real increase in crime by young blacks,
Accept that there is institutional racism
Black criminality stems from racial discrimination, low wages and unemployment.
See Black youth having high aspirations but not able to achieve them.
Left Realism see origins of crime as three folds:
Relative deprivation
Lea and Young argue that frustrated
between expectations and the reality of
lifestyle leads to feelings of relative
deprivation.
They argue the reality
for many young Black
males is a choice of
unemployment,
training schemes.
They feel unfairly
denied the ‘glittering
prizes’ offered to
others. This can
develop into
strategies which can
involve deviant and
criminal behaviour.
Marginalisation
Lea and Young
argue that
marginalisation
means the
process by which
certain groups
find themselves
on the edge of
society.
White and Black
working-class youth
often feel alienated by
schools, unemployment,
low-wages, and the
police.
Subculture
Subculture of young blacks
is different from their
parents who accepted their
marginalised position in
society.
Black youth subculture has high material
expectations and aspirations: money and
status symbols like flash cars, etc.
Black youth is so closely enmeshed in values of
consumption, style and wealth, this is precisely why they
engage in crime because of blocked opportunities.
Policing Problem
Kinsey, Lea and Young identify a number of
problems with contemporary policing.
The police too often resort to 'military policing' as a method of solving
crime through 'stop and search' policies.
This alienates the community from them, recently the Muslim community.
Argue that to improve this relationship the public should have more say in shaping police
policy.
Square of crime
Shows concern for victim patterns and formal and informal factors.
Argue that crime can be
only understood by
interrelationships between
four elements.
State, offender, informal controls and victims.
Jock Young also has a generic
theory to explain the recent
growth in crime. He argues
that late modernity is making
crime worse in a number of
ways:
Greater uncertainty and instability in most
aspects of life.
People’s desire for
Immediate and
personal pleasure.
Less consensus about moral values.
A breakdown of
informal social
controls
Critique of Left Realism
Key strength is recognition of multiple causes of crime.
Focuses on victims as well as offenders is good,
adding another dimension to our understanding
of crime.
However, Relative deprivation or marginalisation
cannot explain the motive behind offender’s actions e.g.
white-collar.
Equally not all people in relative deprivation turn to crime.
It assumes that society’s values break down crime
become more likely a return to anomie theory and a
view not too distant from Right Realism.