null
US
Entrar
Registre-se gratuitamente
Registre-se
Detectamos que o JavaScript não está habilitado no teu navegador. Habilite o Javascript para o funcionamento correto do nosso site. Por favor, leia os
Termos e Condições
para mais informações.
Próximo
Copiar e Editar
Você deve estar logado para concluir esta ação!
Inscreva-se gratuitamente
4274737
P.E.R.V.E.R.T
Descrição
Using P.E.R.V.E.R.T to describe the factors affecting which method you use
Sem etiquetas
a level
sociology
methods
factors affecting
p.e.r.v.e.r.t
practical
ethics
reliability
validity
examples
representativeness
theoretical
sociology
methods
a level
Mapa Mental por
Phoebe Fletcher
, atualizado more than 1 year ago
Mais
Menos
Criado por
Phoebe Fletcher
mais de 8 anos atrás
953
2
0
Resumo de Recurso
P.E.R.V.E.R.T
Practical
How much;
Time
Cost
Access
Travel time/cost
For example;
Not practical to give children/elderly a questionaire
Anotações:
Because they cant read/see/understand the questions
Attention span of sample
Anotações:
Young children will have a small attention span, so a long formal interview probably is not the best option
It can be too dangerous to do certain methods for certain situations
Anotações:
e.g it may be to dangerous to interview a street gang
Some people may be defensive in formal situations
Anotações:
so they may not give you the whole truth
Ethics
Whether it is morally/socially acceptable to do
Do not harm your subjects
Consent
The method used may not give informed consent
Anotações:
e.g a child can not give informed consent, they are not aware enough.
Confidnetiality
You must not make it clear who the subject is
Anotações:
anonymise your infomation
Do not inform others what the subject has told you
Consequences
Question whether the subject could get hurt from you using one method
Anotações:
you could hurt the person mentally, or lead them to getting physically hurt
Is it too intrusive?
Give people a range to hide in
Is the subject to sensitive?
Reliability
Can another researcher do your experiment getting the same results
Structured questionaires are a good method for reliability
Anotações:
Exactly the same questions, with no changing and the same subject should lead to the same results
Crime stats are generally reliable
Anotações:
easy to compare you can find them in the public domain (no ethical issues)
Validity
Is it true?
Are you likely to get the truth?
You are likely to get the truth in participant observation
Anotações:
More likely to get the truth in the subjects 'natural' setting than in a formal interview setting
Is you go natural to find how people normally act, how will your presence affect the way people act?
Secondary data is not valid as it is socially constructive
Anotações:
e.g in catholic countries families will cover up sucides as accidents, to save the deceased 'face'
Examples
Always use an example, to explain or illustrate your point.
Representativeness
Is this method likely to produce results that can be generalized?
e.g Large-scale more likely to be representative, but small-scale is more likely to provide valuable insights
Theoretical
Is the method more likely to produce value-free objective information?
Is the suggested method more associated with positivists or interpretivists?
Quer criar seus próprios
Mapas Mentais
gratuitos
com a GoConqr?
Saiba mais
.
Semelhante
Functionalist Theory of Crime
A M
Realist Theories
A M
Control, Punishment & Victims
A M
Ethnicity, Crime & Justice
A M
DOCUMENTS
ashiana121
Clinical Psychology
Andreea Gherman
Sociology: Crime and Deviance Flash cards
Beth Morley
Maths C4 Trig formulae (OCR MEI)
Zacchaeus Snape
A level Computing Quiz
Zacchaeus Snape
All AS Maths Equations/Calculations and Questions
natashaaaa
Using GoConqr to teach French
Sarah Egan
Explore a Biblioteca