Would persons in such a state of nature agree to surrender their freedom to those who ruled them?

Descrição

who rules them
lstaffordsmith
Mapa Mental por lstaffordsmith, atualizado more than 1 year ago
lstaffordsmith
Criado por lstaffordsmith quase 11 anos atrás
29
0

Resumo de Recurso

Would persons in such a state of nature agree to surrender their freedom to those who ruled them?
  1. Hobbes
    1. Had a pessimistic view of life in the state of nature: 'solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short', that isolated individuals would rationally contract with each other to hand over all of their sovereignty to a single sovereign.
      1. Hobbes saw this as unconditional except if an individual's life was threatened.
    2. On what conditions...
      1. Locke
        1. Sovereignty and natural rights were both present in the state of nature.
          1. Sovereign would only retain legitimacy to the extent he protected the individuals right to property.
        2. Rousseau
          1. Saw sovereignty in the will of the people, which remained with them.
            1. Sovereignty could not be the subject of a contract - could only be loaned to representatives, from whom it could be withdrawn.

          Semelhante

          CONVENTIONALISM AND ITS CRITICS: METHODOLOGY ESSAY
          yassinr
          Aquinas
          lstaffordsmith
          John Finnis
          lstaffordsmith
          Natural Law
          Lily Parker
          Natural Law
          Alexa Smith
          Natural Law
          j.donaldson97
          Christian Ethics
          Alexa Smith
          Natural Law
          Sumahlor
          Natural Law
          ELeanor Turner
          Orders backed by threats
          Joanna Ip
          Jurisprudence
          Kate Fuller