Family Law (Topic 1: Marriage, Civil Partnership and Cohabitation) Mapa Mental sobre Marriage, Civil Partnership and Cohabitation, criado por rebeccamusgrove9 em 07-04-2014.
Only available to those of the same sex.
Section 3 sets out the formalities. Two people
are not eligible to register as a civil partner if;
they are not of the same sex, either of them is
already a civil partner or lawfully married,
either of them is under 16 or they are within
the prohibited degrees. It is the same as marriage in all but name.
Equality Act 2010 allows civil partnership to
be part of a religious ceremony but same sex
couples are still not allowed to 'marry'.
Wilkinson v Kitzinger. A Canadian couple
sought a declaration that s 11 MCA was
incompatible with Art 12 ECHR in not allowing
same sex couples to marry. The court held
that the convention protected marriage in the
convention sense between a man and woman
and as other provisions were provided such as
civil partnerships there was no breach.
Schalk v Austria. Two men living in Austria wished to
marry but could not and only a civil partnership was
available although this did give them the same legal rights
as marriage. They argued this was a breach of ECHR.
The court reaffirmed that Art 12 only protected opposite
sex couples. the court took the view that same sex
marriage is controversial and each state should make it's
own decision and be afforded a margin of appreciation.
Differences between marriage and civil
partnership
Under MCA S1 (2)(a) Adultery can be used to establish a
ground for divorce. Under the CPA s 44(5) which lists the facts
needed for dissolution adultery is not one of them.
Under MCA S 12(a) and (b) Non-consummation can be a
ground for rendering a marriage voidable. Under CPA s 50
(1) which lists the grounds for rendering a civil partnership
voidable non-consummation is not one of them.
Under MCA S12(e) If the respondent has a venereal
disease this can render the marriage voidable. Under
the CPA s 50 (1) venereal disease is not included as a
ground for rendering a civil partnership voidable.
Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013
Marriage
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
Section 11- Grounds on which a marriage is void
Within prohibited degrees of relationship
Includes; parent, child, grandparent, grand
children, siblings, uncle. nephew, aunty, niece.
Includes whole and half blood relationships.
Cousins may marry under English Law. A marriage
between a step parent/grandparent and step
child/grandchild will be void unless they are both
over 21 AND the younger has not been a 'child of
the family'. There are also restrictions between
adopted child and members of their birth family.
an adoptive child and adoptive parent are also
within the prohibited degrees.
Either part is under the age of 16
Parental consent is required for 16 and
17 year olds to marry but the absence of
such consent does not mean the
marriage is void.
The parties have intermarried
in disregard of certain
requirements as to the
formation of marriage
Must have knowingly and
wilfully failed to comply
with the
requirements.Cases on the
ceremony- Hudson v Leigh
MA v J
At the time of the marriage
either part was already lawfully
married
The parties are not
respectively male and
female
See civil partnerships and
same sex marriage. W v W
In the case of a polygamous
marriage either party was domiciled
in England and Wales
Void Marriage= The marriage is
automatically void; there is no need to
obtain a court order to say so. any person
can apply to have a marriage declared
void. A child born to a couple in a void
marriage is 'illegitimate' unless the
couple believed their marriage to be
valid. However, illegitimacy has very
little significance in law today.
Section 12- Grounds on which a marriage is voidable
Marriage has not been consummated
owing to the incapacity of either party
to consummate it
Heterosexual definition. penetration of the vagina by the penis no other form of sexual activity is relevant.
There must be 'ordinary and complete intercourse...not partial and imperfect intercourse.' It must take place
after marriage. Only one act of penetration is required. There is no requirements that the intercourse is
capable of procreation. An inability to consummate must be; permanent and incurable, must relate to
intercourse with the spouse and it may be physical or may arise from 'invincible repugnance'. The law is not
clear whether the inability to consummate must be present at the ceremony or whether if the inability arises
after the ceremony it would be sufficient grounds.
the marriage has not been consummated
owing to the wilful refusal of the respondent to
consummate it
This is to be given an ordinary
interpretation. A person cannot rely on
their own wilful refusal.
Either party to the marriage did not validly
consent to it, duress, mistake, unsoundness of
mind or otherwise.
Forced marriage offences currently before parliament and new offences are being created. Cases- A
Local Authority V N (2007) Westminster CC V IC (2008). Duress- will overbourne by a genuine and
reasonably held fear caused by threat of immediate danger to life limb or liberty. Hirani Test (effect of the
threat rather than kind of theat) followed in the lower courts.Mistake- Moss v Moss, the mistake must be
fundamental such as identity. Unsoundness of mind- Sheffield CC V E (2004). Capable of understanding
the nature of marriage. The courts are not against forced marriage or pressure from family the threat must
be powerful.
at the time of the marriage either party though capable of giving
valid consent was suffering from a mental disorder within the
meaning of the Mental Health Act 1983, unfit for marriage.
Sheffield CC V E. A young woman who has 21 had the
capacity of a 13 year old. The court said that in order to
fulfill the capacity test she must not have the capacity to
understand the nature of marriage at all. It would be
insufficient to say she didn't understand the particular
marriage or type of person she was marrying.
At the time of marriage the
respondent was suffering from a
venereal disease in a
communicable form.
At the time of the marriage the
respondent was pregnant by some
person other than the petitioner.
An interim gender recognition certificate has
been issued to either party after the marriage.
The respondent is a person whose gender at
the time of the marriage had become acquired
under the Gender Recognition Act 2004.
Voidability- the court will not grant a decree of nullity on the groun that
the marriage is voidable if the respondent satisfies the court that the
petitioner with knowledge conducted himself so as to lead the respondent
to reasonably believe that he would not seek to do so and that it would be
unjust to the respondent to grant the decree.
Section 50 Civil Partnership Act 2004 contains equivalent grounds for
voidability but NOT: incapacity to consummate, wilful refusal to
consummate or veneral disease. Delete
Voidable marriage= The marriage can only be set aside if there is a
court order. Without a court order annulling the marriage, it is a valid
one. Only the parties to the marriage can apply to have a voidable
marriage annulled. A child born to a couple in a voidable marriage is
not 'illegitimate'. Delete
Voidable marriage= The marriage can only be set aside if there is a
court order. Without a court order annulling the marriage, it is a valid
one. Only the parties to the marriage can apply to have a voidable
marriage annulled. A child born to a couple in a voidable marriage is
not 'illegitimate'.
Section 25 a party may seek a decree of nullity
if the marriage is void or voidable under Section
11 or Section 12
Section 13- Bars to Annulment
Even if the applicant establishes
one of the voidable grounds he
cannot annul the marriage if one of
the following is present
Approbation. the petitioner knew they
could have avoided the marriage but
behaved in such a way that the
respondent believed they would not seek
to annul the marriage.
Three year bar if the applicant
relies on grounds C D E F or H.
Proceedings must be instituted
within three years.
Six month bar if the applicant
relies on G and proceedings must
be instituted within 6 months.
Ignorance. In the case of E F and H the
court cannot issue a decree unless satisfied
that the petitioner was ignorant.
Gender Recognition Act 2004
Same Sex Couples Act 2003
Gender Recognition Act 2004
Section 2 (1) Gender Recognition Certificate
Section 2(1) allows someone to apply for a Gender Recognition Certificate so that his or her legal sex
will be the 'acquired gender'. the requirements are; has or has had gender dysphoria, has lived in the
acquired gender throughout the period of two years ending with the date on which the application is
made, intends to continue to live in the acquired gender until death and complies with the
requirements in section 3. You do not need surgery to have a certificate. Once you have a certificate
that will be your gender for all purposes. A married person can only apply for an interim certificate.
Once the certificate is issued then either party can apply for the marriage to be annulled. If the
marriage is annulled then the certificate becomes a full one. If the marriage is not annulled then the
'new sex' will not be recognised for fear that it will create a same sex marriage. Once the person has
their 'new sex' they can enter into a marriage of civil partnership according to their g
Theory and Questions
Decline of marriage and religious ceremonies
Reasons why people marry
Legal
Religious
Children
Finances
Contract
What does the law value in adult relationships?
Dependency
Tradition and children
legitimate.
Burden v UK
Cohabitation
Differences between Marriage and Civil
Partnership and Cohabitation.
To enter or end a marriage of CP formality
requirements must be met. There are no
requirements to end cohabitation.
At the end of a
marriage of CP the court
can redistribute the
couples property, the
court has now power
over cohabitants.
During marriage one spouse can seek financial
support from the other. There is no obligation
for a cohabitant to support the other.
A father who is married to the mother of his child with
automatically have parental responsiblity. A man who
is not married will not automatically gain PR.
When someone dies without a will their
spouse will automatically inherit this is
not the case for cohabitants.
There are tax benefits for spouses
but there are no advantages for
unmarried couples.
Cohabiting couples often think they have the same rights as married couples
but they are mistaken. It is important to consider different areas of law and
how they are treated. It is accepted that there should be reform but it is
difficult to define the different types of relationships.