Situation ethics was most
famously championed by
Joseph Fletcher
(1905-1991).
He believed that we should follow the
rules until we need to break them for
reasons of love.
It is based on agape love (Christian
unconditional love), and says that
we should always do the most
loving thing in any situation.
Fletcher rejected following
rules regardless (legalism)
and also the idea that we
should not have any rules
(antinomianism) and said
that we need to find a
balance between the two.
Four Working Principles - when establishing his
version of situation ethics, Fletcher used four
key principles which he aimed to fulfil in writing
his theory:
Pragmatism - it has to
work in daily life: it has
to be practical
Relativism - there
should be no fixed
rules
Positivism - it must put
faith before reasoning: "I
am a Christian, so what
should I do?"
Personalism - people
should be at the
centre of the theory
Six Fundamental Principles -
there are six fundamental things
that underlie Fletcher's Situation
Ethics:
Love is the only
absolute - it is
intrinsically good
Christian decision
making is based on
love
Justice is love
distributed
Love wants the
good for anyone,
whoever they are
Only the end
justifies the
means
Love is acted out
situationally not
prescriptively
Advantages
It uses rules to provide
framework but allows
people to break rules
to reflect life's
complexities
Disadvantages
It does not provide a
clear definition of what
love actaully is
Some might say it is too subjective -
because decisions have to be made
from within the situation
Agape love is too much to
aspire to and may be
polluted by a selfish
human tendency
It is human
nature to love
family more than
strangers