BEVERIDGE v's NEW RIGHT

Descrição

UNIT 21 Mapa Mental sobre BEVERIDGE v's NEW RIGHT, criado por Jen Collins em 17-05-2013.
Jen Collins
Mapa Mental por Jen Collins, atualizado more than 1 year ago
Jen Collins
Criado por Jen Collins mais de 11 anos atrás
81
3

Resumo de Recurso

BEVERIDGE v's NEW RIGHT
  1. new right supporters
    1. argued Beveridge failed to take following into account
      1. outcomes and costs
        1. failed to pay attention to economy, effectivness and efficiency
          1. took the service user out of the driving seat
            1. beveridge reforms were inflexible and limited provided limited choice to the service user
      2. Paul Wilding and Vic George
      3. Beveridge supporters
        1. argued that
          1. Money that could be used for care would be poured into setting up new systems and private profit
            1. care work would be pushed back onto unpaid carers
              1. in an attempt to win contracts private companies would cut costs to undercut other bids. This would result in staff wage cuts
                1. thinking of people who needed care as customers who could exercise choice was inappropriate

        Semelhante

        UNIT 21 CHAPTER 3 NEW N.H.S 1948-1979 AND CHA PTER 4 SOCIAL CARE
        Louise Carey
        UNIT 21- legislations between 1944 + 1949
        Louise Carey
        Beveridge report
        Charlie_eeyore
        The Vision: an all-inclusive welfare state
        Charlie_eeyore
        UNIT 21 CHAPTER 1
        Louise Carey
        WELFARE STATE: POST WW 2 (1936-45) BEVERIDGE
        Jen Collins
        THATCHERISM: The New Right, anti-collectivist 1979-1990
        Jen Collins
        UNIT 21 CHAPTER 2
        Louise Carey
        Seebohm Report 1968
        Jen Collins
        1st GIANT EVIL:WANT
        Jen Collins
        5th EVIL: SQUALOR
        Jen Collins