The extent to which observers agree, calculated by dividing the total agreements by total number of observations. Results of 0.8 to 1 are good.
Inter-observer reliability
Internal reliability
External reliability
Inter-reviewer reliability
Split-half method
Test-retest method
Internal Validity
External Validity
A measure of the extent to which something is consistent within itself. e.g. all the questions on an IQ test should be measuring the same thing.
Inter-interviewer reliability
Internal validity
Observer bias
Face validity
Reliability means
Consistency
Replication
A measure of consistency over several different occasions, e.g. if the same interview by the same interviewer with the same interviewee was conducted one day then a week later, outcome should be the same- otherwise interviewer = unreliable.
internal reliability
external validity
concurrent validity
My buttocks are smooth, my mind is clear, vote Ukip.
Achieved if two interviewers produce the same outcome, like inter-observer reliability.
Compare a person's performance on two halves of a questionnaire or test. If the test is assessing the same thing in all its questions, then there should be a close correlation between both halves' scores. This helps measure internal reliability.
The Queen in a leotard
Concurrent validity
Observer biased-ness-noss-nessity
Involves giving an individual a test on one occasion, then this is repeated again after an interval, e.g. 1 month. If the measure is reliable, the outcome should be the same every time.
Cin yew till wat eet ees yit?
Inter-interviewer reliabili8ty
Is this an inter-observer reliability strengthening technique? 'Training observers in the use of a coding system/behaviour checklist'
Euh... Ouais!
Mais non! Zut alors!
euh... bof....*shrugs*
Does the test measure what it is supposed to measure, or are EVs getting in the way?
External validity
face validity
Made up of population, time, and ecological
When what someone observes is influenced by their expectations
inter-interviewer reliability
MInd yer own business.
Whether the test looks as though it is measuring what the researcher intends to measure, e.g. Are the questions in an interview obviously related to a topic?
Reliability
Validity