null
US
Entrar
Registre-se gratuitamente
Registre-se
Detectamos que o JavaScript não está habilitado no teu navegador. Habilite o Javascript para o funcionamento correto do nosso site. Por favor, leia os
Termos e Condições
para mais informações.
Próximo
Copiar e Editar
Você deve estar logado para concluir esta ação!
Inscreva-se gratuitamente
7105541
Self-Incrimination
Descrição
Quiz on self-incrimination.
Sem etiquetas
evidence
law
canadian law
kiyani evidence
Quiz por
David Isaac
, atualizado more than 1 year ago
Mais
Menos
Criado por
David Isaac
aproximadamente 8 anos atrás
18
0
0
Resumo de Recurso
Questão 1
Questão
The term "person in authority" in the common law confessions rule refers to
Responda
The Crown or police.
Someone involved in the criminal justice system.
Someone involved in the arrest, detention, interrogation or prosecution of the accused.
Someone the accused reasonably ought to know will inform the police.
Questão 2
Questão
The parents of a child are...
Responda
Not generally considered a person of authority.
Not a person of authority unless they have interacted with the police.
A person in authority, as a reasonable person would think they will contact the police.
Questão 3
Questão
The criteria for voluntariness are... (check all that apply)
Responda
Whether or not the confession is induced by a promise that things will be better if they confess.
Whether or not the confession is produced by threats or promises.
Whether or not the confession is made by oppression.
Whether or not the confession is made by someone who is deeply upset.
Whether or not the person who makes it has an operating mind.
Whether or not the police engage in trickery that would shock the community conscience.
Whether or not the police engage in disingenuous behaviour.
Questão 4
Questão
In order to admit a confession, one of the things the crown needs to show that probative value outweighs prejudicial effect.
Responda
True
False
Questão 5
Questão
According to R v Edwards, in order to make an application under s. 24 of the Charter, you have to show that
Responda
Your rights were infringed.
Your rights, or the rights of someone materially related to the charge against you were infringed.
Your rights, or the rights of someone connected to the event of the charge in time and place were infringed.
Questão 6
Questão
Evidence can be excluded if a reasonable person would think that admitting it would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.
Responda
True
False
Questão 7
Questão
In the context of R v Grant, the moral blameworthiness of the police's action is reduced if the state had not other way to get the evidence.
Responda
True
False
Questão 8
Questão
Extenuating circumstances play no role in determining the seriousness of the infringing police conduct.
Responda
True
False
Quer criar seus próprios
Quizzes
gratuitos
com a GoConqr?
Saiba mais
.
Semelhante
Contract Law
sherhui94
How Parliament Makes Laws
harryloftus505
A-Level Law: Theft
amyclare96
AQA AS LAW, Unit 1, Section A, Parliamentary Law Making 1/3
Nerdbot98
Law Commission 1965
ria rachel
The Criminal Courts
thornamelia
A2 Law: Cases - Defence of Insanity
Jessica 'JessieB
A2 Law: Special Study - Robbery
Jessica 'JessieB
Omissions
ameliathorn0325
AS Law Jury Case Quiz
Fionnghuala Malone
Criminal Law
jesusreyes88
Explore a Biblioteca