Evaluating Functionalism
Functionalism emphasises the social nature of religion and the positive functions it performs, however it neglects the negative aspects, such as religion as a source of oppression of the poor or women.
It ignores religion as a source of division or conflict, especially in complex modern societies where there is more than one religion (called religious pluralism), where it is difficult to see how religion unites people and promotes integration.
Whilst the idea of civil religion overcomes this problem somewhat, is it really a religion if it does not involve a belief in the supernatural?
Durkheim:
STRENGTH: evidence is provided for his theory - the Aborigines
STRENGTH: sacred objects present in most world religions
LIMITATION: Worsley said that there is no division between the sacred and the profane, as some clans shared totems. Also, even if Durkheim is right about totemism, it doesn't mean that he's right about all religions.
LIMITATION: Durkheim's theory may apply best to small scale societies with a single religion, as it is harder to apply it to larger, multi-faith societies where religions may be in conflict. His theory explains social integration within society, but not the conflict between them.
LIMITATION: Postmodernists such as Mestrovic argue that Durkheim's ides cannot be applied to contemporary society, because increasing diversity has fragmented the collective conscience, so there is no longer a single shared value system for religion to reinforce.
Malinowski:
STRENGTH: more people turn to religion at times of life crises (e.g. funerals, weddings and christenings - even if they aren't religious the rest of the time
LIMITATION: basing ideas on a small scale society doesn't reflect the complexities of more modern, larger societies
Parsons:
STRENGTH: religion provides definitive answers to ultimate questions such as why good people suffer and life after death
LIMITATION: religion cannot be the primary source of meaning; scientific findings are given more weight in modern society - as Parsons was writing in 1967, perhaps his ideas can be written off as outdated.
LIMITATION: Parsons says that religion helps us to stay committed to society's values, when in fact, religion can introduce new values that contradict the values of society
Bellah:
STRENGTH: prominent examples of civil religion in America, when compared to the UK who are much less patriotic and the national anthem is not sung as often
LIMITATION: American civil religion involves loyalty and a belief in God - this discriminates against Buddhists, atheists and other beliefs which don't involve God - this separates people, instead of unifying them