Question 1
Question
For Criminal liability to result, the prosecution (the state) must prove, [blank_start]beyond a reasonable doubt[blank_end], that the accused has committed (i) [blank_start]voluntary[blank_end] conduct which is [blank_start]unlawful[blank_end] (sometimes referred to as an [blank_start]actus reus[blank_end]) and that this conduct was accompanied by (ii) [blank_start]criminal capacity[blank_end] and (iii) [blank_start]fault[blank_end] (sometimes referred to as [blank_start]mens rea[blank_end]).
Question 2
Question
To qualify as conduct of which the criminal law will take cognizance the conduct must be (a) that of a [blank_start]human being[blank_end] that was (b) [blank_start]voluntary[blank_end]. It may be (c) an [blank_start]act[blank_end] or [blank_start]omission[blank_end]. In the case of [blank_start]consequence[blank_end] crimes, there must be (d) [blank_start]causation[blank_end]. Finally the conduct must be (e) [blank_start]unlawful[blank_end].
Answer
-
human being
-
voluntary
-
act
-
omission
-
consequence
-
causation
-
unlawful
Question 3
Question
How many defences excluding unlawfulness are there in South African Criminal Law?
Question 4
Question
In order to prove criminal capacity, the state must prove that the accused had what at the time of the comission of the crime?
Question 5
Question
The defences excluding capacity are [blank_start]youthfulness[blank_end], [blank_start]intoxication[blank_end], [blank_start]pathological[blank_end] incapacity and non-[blank_start]pathological[blank_end] incapacity.
Answer
-
youthfulness
-
intoxication
-
pathological
-
pathological
Question 6
Question
In order to prove fault, the prosecution must be able to prove that the accused had acted intentionally OR negligently AND that the accused had knowledge of the unlawfulness of his/her actions.
Question 7
Question
Intention is divided into four varieties: [blank_start]dolus directus[blank_end] (the aim and object of the accused ), [blank_start]dous indirectus[blank_end] (the accused foresaw the reasonable possibility of that particular consequence occurring), [blank_start]dolus eventualis[blank_end] (the accused foresaw the remote possibility of the consequence occurring and accepted this possibility into the bargain) and [blank_start]dolus inderterminatus[blank_end] (where the accused did not have a particular object or person in mind, can take the form of the prior three dolus').
Answer
-
dolus indeterminatus
-
dolus indirectus
-
dolus eventualis
-
dolus directus
-
dolus indirectus
-
dolus indeterminatus
-
dolus eventualis
-
dolus directus
-
dolus eventualis
-
dolus indeterminatus
-
dolus directus
-
dolus indirectus
-
dolus inderterminatus
-
dolus eventualis
-
dolus indirectus
-
dolus directus
Question 8
Question
A [blank_start]perpetrator[blank_end] is someone who satisfies the definitional elements of a particular crime. An [blank_start]accomplice[blank_end] is someone who knowingly associates himself with the commission of the crime or who furthers the commission of the crime. All those who actively associate in the common purpose with the requisite guilty mind will be [blank_start]co-perpetrators[blank_end].
Answer
-
perpetrator
-
accomplice
-
co-perpetrators
Question 9
Question
[blank_start]Murder[blank_end] is the [blank_start]unlawful[blank_end] and [blank_start]intentional[blank_end] killing of another person.
Answer
-
Murder
-
unlawful
-
intentional
Question 10
Question
[blank_start]Culpable homicide[blank_end] is the [blank_start]unlawful[blank_end] and negligent killing of another person.
Answer
-
Culpable homicide
-
unlawful
Question 11
Question
Assault is unlawfully and [blank_start]intentionally[blank_end]: (i) applying [blank_start]force[blank_end] to the person of another; or (ii) inspiring a [blank_start]belief[blank_end] in that other that force is [blank_start]immediately[blank_end] to be applied to him or her.
Answer
-
intentionally
-
force
-
belief
-
immediately
Question 12
Question
Rape is the [blank_start]unlawful[blank_end], [blank_start]intentional[blank_end], [blank_start]non-consensual[blank_end] sexual penetration of another.
Answer
-
unlawful
-
lawful
-
intentional
-
negligent
-
non-consensual
-
consensual
Question 13
Question
[blank_start]Theft[blank_end] is the unlawful and [blank_start]intentional[blank_end] appropriation with intent to steal of a thing capable of being [blank_start]stolen[blank_end].
Question 14
Question
[blank_start]Robbery[blank_end] is the theft of [blank_start]property[blank_end] by [blank_start]intentionally[blank_end] using violence or threats of violence to induce submission to the taking of it from another.
Answer
-
Robbery
-
Theft
-
property
-
a thing
-
intentionally
-
negligently
Question 15
Question
Fraud is unlawfully making, with the intent to defraud, a misrepresentation that causes actual prejudice or which is potentially prejudicial to another.
Question 16
Question
Malicious damage to property is unlawfully and negligently damaging the property of another.
Question 17
Question
Arson is unlawfully setting an immovable structure on fire with intent to injure another.
Question 18
Question
Housebreaking with intent to commit a crime is unlawfully [blank_start]breaking[blank_end] and [blank_start]entering[blank_end] premises with [blank_start]intent[blank_end] to commit that crime.
Question 19
Question
[blank_start]Public violence[blank_end] is the unlawful and [blank_start]intentional[blank_end] commission by a number of people acting in [blank_start]concert[blank_end] of acts of sufficiently serious dimensions which are intended forcibly to [blank_start]disturb[blank_end] the public peace or security or to [blank_start]invade[blank_end] the rights of others.
Answer
-
Public violence
-
intentional
-
concert
-
disturb
-
invade
Question 20
Question
[blank_start]Treason[blank_end] is an overt act unlawfully committed by a person owing [blank_start]allegiance[blank_end] to a state with intent to [blank_start]overthrow[blank_end], impair, violate, threaten or endanger the [blank_start]existence[blank_end], independence or security of the state or to overthrow or coerce the government of the state or change the [blank_start]constitutional[blank_end] structure of the state.
Answer
-
Treason
-
allegiance
-
overthrow
-
existence
-
constitutional
Question 21
Question
Defeating or obstructing the course of justice is unlawfully doing an act that is intended to defeat or obstruct and which does defeat or obstruct the due administration of justice.