null
US
Sign In
Sign Up for Free
Sign Up
We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. The dynamic nature of our site means that Javascript must be enabled to function properly. Please read our
terms and conditions
for more information.
Next up
Copy and Edit
You need to log in to complete this action!
Register for Free
7105541
Self-Incrimination
Description
Quiz on self-incrimination.
No tags specified
evidence
law
canadian law
kiyani evidence
Quiz by
David Isaac
, updated more than 1 year ago
More
Less
Created by
David Isaac
about 8 years ago
18
0
0
Resource summary
Question 1
Question
The term "person in authority" in the common law confessions rule refers to
Answer
The Crown or police.
Someone involved in the criminal justice system.
Someone involved in the arrest, detention, interrogation or prosecution of the accused.
Someone the accused reasonably ought to know will inform the police.
Question 2
Question
The parents of a child are...
Answer
Not generally considered a person of authority.
Not a person of authority unless they have interacted with the police.
A person in authority, as a reasonable person would think they will contact the police.
Question 3
Question
The criteria for voluntariness are... (check all that apply)
Answer
Whether or not the confession is induced by a promise that things will be better if they confess.
Whether or not the confession is produced by threats or promises.
Whether or not the confession is made by oppression.
Whether or not the confession is made by someone who is deeply upset.
Whether or not the person who makes it has an operating mind.
Whether or not the police engage in trickery that would shock the community conscience.
Whether or not the police engage in disingenuous behaviour.
Question 4
Question
In order to admit a confession, one of the things the crown needs to show that probative value outweighs prejudicial effect.
Answer
True
False
Question 5
Question
According to R v Edwards, in order to make an application under s. 24 of the Charter, you have to show that
Answer
Your rights were infringed.
Your rights, or the rights of someone materially related to the charge against you were infringed.
Your rights, or the rights of someone connected to the event of the charge in time and place were infringed.
Question 6
Question
Evidence can be excluded if a reasonable person would think that admitting it would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.
Answer
True
False
Question 7
Question
In the context of R v Grant, the moral blameworthiness of the police's action is reduced if the state had not other way to get the evidence.
Answer
True
False
Question 8
Question
Extenuating circumstances play no role in determining the seriousness of the infringing police conduct.
Answer
True
False
Show full summary
Hide full summary
Want to create your own
Quizzes
for
free
with GoConqr?
Learn more
.
Similar
Contract Law
sherhui94
How Parliament Makes Laws
harryloftus505
A-Level Law: Theft
amyclare96
AQA AS LAW, Unit 1, Section A, Parliamentary Law Making 1/3
Nerdbot98
Law Commission 1965
ria rachel
The Criminal Courts
thornamelia
A2 Law: Cases - Defence of Insanity
Jessica 'JessieB
A2 Law: Special Study - Robbery
Jessica 'JessieB
Omissions
ameliathorn0325
AS Law Jury Case Quiz
Fionnghuala Malone
Criminal Law
jesusreyes88
Browse Library