Self-Incrimination

Description

Quiz on self-incrimination.
David Isaac
Quiz by David Isaac, updated more than 1 year ago
David Isaac
Created by David Isaac about 8 years ago
18
0

Resource summary

Question 1

Question
The term "person in authority" in the common law confessions rule refers to
Answer
  • The Crown or police.
  • Someone involved in the criminal justice system.
  • Someone involved in the arrest, detention, interrogation or prosecution of the accused.
  • Someone the accused reasonably ought to know will inform the police.

Question 2

Question
The parents of a child are...
Answer
  • Not generally considered a person of authority.
  • Not a person of authority unless they have interacted with the police.
  • A person in authority, as a reasonable person would think they will contact the police.

Question 3

Question
The criteria for voluntariness are... (check all that apply)
Answer
  • Whether or not the confession is induced by a promise that things will be better if they confess.
  • Whether or not the confession is produced by threats or promises.
  • Whether or not the confession is made by oppression.
  • Whether or not the confession is made by someone who is deeply upset.
  • Whether or not the person who makes it has an operating mind.
  • Whether or not the police engage in trickery that would shock the community conscience.
  • Whether or not the police engage in disingenuous behaviour.

Question 4

Question
In order to admit a confession, one of the things the crown needs to show that probative value outweighs prejudicial effect.
Answer
  • True
  • False

Question 5

Question
According to R v Edwards, in order to make an application under s. 24 of the Charter, you have to show that
Answer
  • Your rights were infringed.
  • Your rights, or the rights of someone materially related to the charge against you were infringed.
  • Your rights, or the rights of someone connected to the event of the charge in time and place were infringed.

Question 6

Question
Evidence can be excluded if a reasonable person would think that admitting it would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.
Answer
  • True
  • False

Question 7

Question
In the context of R v Grant, the moral blameworthiness of the police's action is reduced if the state had not other way to get the evidence.
Answer
  • True
  • False

Question 8

Question
Extenuating circumstances play no role in determining the seriousness of the infringing police conduct.
Answer
  • True
  • False
Show full summary Hide full summary

Similar

Contract Law
sherhui94
How Parliament Makes Laws
harryloftus505
A-Level Law: Theft
amyclare96
AQA AS LAW, Unit 1, Section A, Parliamentary Law Making 1/3
Nerdbot98
Law Commission 1965
ria rachel
The Criminal Courts
thornamelia
A2 Law: Cases - Defence of Insanity
Jessica 'JessieB
A2 Law: Special Study - Robbery
Jessica 'JessieB
Omissions
ameliathorn0325
AS Law Jury Case Quiz
Fionnghuala Malone
Criminal Law
jesusreyes88