Question 1
Question
PESTEL ANALYSIS:
EG P[blank_start]olitical[blank_end]: Shell oil have a strong relationship with N[blank_start]igerian[blank_end] government
EG E[blank_start]conomic[blank_end]: impact on machine t[blank_start]ool[blank_end] industry
EG Socio-[blank_start]cultural[blank_end]- Levi S[blank_start]trauss[blank_end] struggled to attract younger generation despite being a huge market player
EG L[blank_start]egal[blank_end]-Alcohol adverts can't be se[blank_start]xual[blank_end] or linked with cou[blank_start]rage[blank_end]
Answer
-
olitical
-
conomic
-
cultural
-
egal
-
xual
-
rage
-
igerian
-
ool
-
trauss
Question 2
Question
Porter's five forces (19[blank_start]79[blank_end]) as a rule, the stronger the five forces, the lower combined pr[blank_start]ofitability[blank_end] of participants
-Threat of new entry (product dif[blank_start]ferentiation[blank_end])
-threat of su[blank_start]bstitute[blank_end] products (threat of ob[blank_start]solesce[blank_end])
-power of buyers (threaten backward vertical integration into raw materials)
-power of suppliers (threaten forward int[blank_start]egration[blank_end] into retail)
-threat of rivalry (slow industry growth)
Answer
-
79
-
ofitability
-
ferentiation
-
bstitute
-
solence
-
egration
Question 3
Question
Porters five forces (1979) CRITIQUE: bi[blank_start]as[blank_end] of economics over politics, less effective in un[blank_start]stable[blank_end] industries, static framework, no account of c[blank_start]ooperation[blank_end]
Question 4
Question
Critique against Porter's 5 forces: [blank_start]Ramel[blank_end]t, R (1991) believes that even though industry can impact the business, it is
mostly down to the in[blank_start]dividua[blank_end]l organisations. Flaws in the industry are down to 'random dist[blank_start]ribution[blank_end] of especially
high and low performing businesses across in[blank_start]dustries[blank_end]'
Answer
-
Ramel
-
dividua
-
ribution
-
dustries
Question 5
Question
Branden[blank_start]burg[blank_end] and Nal[blank_start]ebuff[blank_end]'s Value Net (1996) looks at cooperation which Porter ignores. use g[blank_start]ame[blank_end] theory to show dynamic industries, once you have the 5 segments sorted then identify all the elements in the game.
PARTS of the game:
P[blank_start]layers[blank_end] (construct relationships)
Added v[blank_start]alues[blank_end] (measure what everyone brings to the game)
R[blank_start]ules[blank_end] (structure of the way the game is being played)
Ta[blank_start]ctics[blank_end] (devices to shape players' perception)
Sc[blank_start]ope[blank_end] (limits and links of the game)
Answer
-
burg
-
ebuff
-
ame
-
layers
-
alues
-
ules
-
ctics
-
ope
Question 6
Question
EG Value-net: [blank_start]Inte[blank_end]l invested into the application 'Pro[blank_start]Share[blank_end]' in the mid-nineties which allowed people to hold video conferences online. Using the value net they found comp[blank_start]limentary[blank_end] companies like telephone companies could sell faster connections to their shared customers and su[blank_start]bsidised[blank_end] the cost for Proshare.
Answer
-
Inte
-
Share
-
limentary
-
bsidised
Question 7
Question
Scenario P[blank_start]lanning[blank_end] (B[blank_start]ur[blank_end]t, G) 2006 not predictions or extrapolation but a description of current events and their proj[blank_start]ection[blank_end] into the future, it is a SOCIAL R[blank_start]EASONING[blank_end] PROCESS
EG [blank_start]Apple[blank_end] has been known to use this to keep their op[blank_start]tions[blank_end] open for the future and ob[blank_start]ses[blank_end]s over competitors actions to stay in the lead
Answer
-
lanning
-
ur
-
ection
-
EASONING
-
Apple
-
ses
-
tions
Question 8
Question
COMBINING PESTEL AND SCENARIO PLANNING both recognise level of un[blank_start]certainty[blank_end], take into account multiple per[blank_start]spective[blank_end]s, considers range of plausible futures, implications for strategy