Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Verification Principle
- Cognitive
- Language deals with factual statements
that can be proved to be either true or
false. These can be either empirically
provable, such as 'The Queen is the Head
of State', or statement that, as far as
believers are concerned, contain
meaningful factual content, such as 'God
exists' or 'God loves me'.
- Logical Positivism
- Criteria of meaning
- Used Hume's idea of empiricism
& applied it to language
- Experience could be categorised
as a criterion of meaning
- Experience is key
- For anything to have meaning it has to be verifiable
- see
- hear
- touch
- smell
- taste
- It has to have the ability to be
verified to be true or false
- A sentence must be considered
meaningless if it cannot be verified
- Rejected metaphysics -
it is fruitless
- Meaningless to talk of God
- Not possible to empiricaly test concepts of God
- Only those propositions that can be
verifies empirically have meaning
- Shclick
- 'The meaning of a proposition is the method of verification;
- a posteriori reasoning
- synthetic propsitions
- Miracles are meaningless
- The intervention of God is only the supposed effect
- David Hume
- All ideas are based on experience
- Experience = True Knowledge
- Matters of Fact
- Logic & Mathematics not
based on experience
- 'relation of ideas'
- Empiricism
- A.J.Ayer
- Tried to reinterpret the verification principle
- Outlined distinction between verifiablity
- In Pricniple
- Therefore is meaningful
- Scientific laws may be
verifiable in principle
- In Practice
- Scientific laws can't be
verified in practice
- Other type of distincition
- Strong Verification
- To directly observe something
- Weak Verification
- Some form of sense
experience that
counts toward it
- it is possible for experience to render it probable
- Accepted a priori truths
- Criticisms
- The verifiction
principle itself is
maningless
- Hick
- Eschatological verification
- We can verify God's exsitence when we die
- Practical prolems
- Blackholes
- Mental Illnesses
- Historical statements
- Design Argument is weak
verification for the existence of God
- Evil & Suffering
- Laws such as 'do not kill'
can be considered
menaingless
- Affects religous and secular laws
- Kieth Ward
- 'If I were God I would be able to check out the truch of my
own existnec'
- Verifiable through principle
- Strengths
- Anything meaningful is learnt &
developed through our
experiences i.e. compassion
- A.J.Ayer's development makes the
principle more acceptable
- Yet his development does not help talk of God
- Makes us think about the meaning of
langauge more carefully
- You cannot make non-cognitive
statements into cognitive ones