Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Research Methods
- Primary
- observations
- unstructured
- structured
- participant
- where the researcher has a role within the group being studied and takes part in activities
- non-participant
- when the researcher has no involvement with the group being studied, and simply observes behaviours from the sidelines
- overt observations
- where the identity and purpose of the researcher is made clear to participants
- covert observations
- where the identity and purpose of the researcher is hidden, and participants are unaware that research is being conducted
- interviews
- structured
- semi-structured
- unstructured
- group interviews
- a method of gathering qualitative data, where a researcher asks questions face-to-face with a respondent
- questionnaires
- a list of open/closed questions that respondents answer without the help of the researcher
- open questions
- allows the respondent to answer in their own words, collects qualitative data
- more valid
- allows issues to be explored more deeply
- difficult to quantify
- less reliable
- closed questions
- allows the respondent to answer through pre-set options, collects quantitative data
- more reliable
- can easily be quantified and graphed
- less valid
- does not tell a researcher WHY a behaviour is occurring
- postal questionnaires
- a large sample can be reached at once
- highly targeted
- cheap (low cost of printing and distribution)
- the respondent may have more time to think about their answers, so their answers may be more honest and valid
- self-completion questionnaires
- face-to-face questionnaires
- internet/email questionnaires
- telephone questionnaires
- experiments
- sociological studies carried our under test conditions in order to remove the influence of confounding variables
- laboratory experiments
- an experimental group is exposed to the independent variable, and a control group is not changed in any way, while all other variables are controlled
- field experiments
- where an experiment is carried out in a natural setting
- Secondary
- official statistics
- statistics collected and published by agencies, eg. NGOs or governments
- official documents
- public documents, eg. media, school records, parish registers
- personal documents, eg. letters, photos, autobiographies
- historical documents
- content analysis
- analysing social life by investigating and interpreting the content of mass media
- Qualitative
- gives an idea of how participants view the world
- more "real-life"
- validity
- preferred by Interpretivist sociologists
- we construct society through the meanings we attach to things
- bottom-up (micro) approach
- subjectivity
- Quantitative
- information presented in a numerical form
- trends/patterns can be analysed
- preferred by Positivist sociologists
- interested in social reality
- objectivity
- top-down (macro) approach
- reliability and representativeness
- PET
- Practical
- time
- cost
- access
- research opportunity
- utility in relation to the research issue
- funding bodies
- researcher's safety
- researcher's personal skills/characteristics
- Ethical
- harm to participants
- informed consent
- confidentiality
- privacy/anonymity
- Theoretical
- methodological preference
- reliability
- validity
- representativeness
- researcher bias
- Hawthorne effect
- Sampling techniques
- random sampling
- every member of the target population has an equal chance of being picked
- equal opportunities
- quick, can even be performed by a computer
- reduces the potential for human bias
- allows researchers to make generalisations within the target population
- can only be used if the population is whole
- may not be representative
- quasi-random sampling
- every 10th, 100th, etc. person on a list is selected
- quick, can even be performed by a computer
- reduces the potential for human bias
- allows researchers to make generalisations within the target population
- equal opportunities
- it can be difficult to gain access to a list
- the list must equally represent every member of the sampling frame
- it can be difficult to contact chosen participants
- stratified random sampling
- dividing the sampling frame into smaller strata (eg. age, gender) and randomly selecting a number of people from each strata
- very representative
- allows large groups to be studied effectively
- fewer sampling errors
- greater precision than random sampling
- smaller samples can be used
- may be more time-consuming to organise
- snowball sampling
- sociologists ask a few volunteers to find other volunteers
- makes it easier for researchers to get volunteers from groups that they may not have access to
- very little effort is required on the part of the researcher
- volunteers may only choose their friends
- peer pressure may force some people to volunteer even if they are not comfortable with the research
- not representative
- volunteer sampling
- sociologists ask for volunteer participants within their sampling frame
- informed consent is easily obtained
- only people from certain social groups may be willing to volunteer
- opportunity sampling
- selecting individuals nearby
- quick, easy
- individuals are not forced to participate
- researcher bias, as they choose who to approach
- may not be representative