Zusammenfassung der Ressource
International Organisations
- INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS TYPES
- Inter-Governmental Organisations (IGO)
- organisations created by states and composed of states
- they have taken on some
of the roles which a state
normally does
- possibly do more
than a state?
- share some basic features with states
- Non-Governmental Organisations (NGO)
- created and composed of private
individuals
- Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International
Organisation (DARIO): Article 2; (1) established by a
treaty or legal instrument (2) members are primarily
states, but can include other entities (3) possess their
own international legal personality
- (1) established by treaty,
referred to as the
constitutional document; lays
out what the organisation will
be, what role and powers it has
and how it will be composed
- adopted by the Commission in 2011
- Pulp Mills on Uruguay River (2010)
- administrative commission of the
Uruguay River (CARU) established treaty
between Argentina and Uruguay
- issue was to deal
with pollution on the
river which formed
the border between
the countries
- deemed an international
organisation, therefore had legal
personality
- Need for common standards
- eg. 1865 - International
Tele-Communications Union;
1919 League of Nations; 1919
International Labour
Organisation
- challenge is
how states can
adopt common
rules on issues
of shared
concern
- the international organisations performed the function
- they were unable
to do this
themselves
- Categorise International Organisations
through their SCOPE and MEMBERSHIP
- UNIVERSAL/GLOBAL
- aspires to include every State
- tries to resolve global issues
- eg. UN
- Admission
- criteria Article 4(1) UN Charter:
peace-loving states which accept the
obligations contained in the present
Charter, and, in the the judgment of
the organisation, are able and willing
to carry out these obligations
- Admissions Opinion
(1948): the criteria in
article 4 are exhaustive
- no legal grounds of exclusion;
and unable to add criteria
- Article 4(2): The admission of
any state to membership in
the United Nations will be
effected by a decision of the
General Assembly upon the
recommendation go the
Security Council
- can be made
easy or hard
- General Assembly votes to
admit, but a
recommendation is needed
from the Security Council
- Permanent five have veto on
membership; Soviet will veto capitalist
country wanting to join, US will veto a
Communist state wanting to join
- Cold War Rivalries
resolved package
deal (1955) both
allowed
communist/capitalist
states in
- Current issues: Palestine - US
veto any admittance, General
Assembly have given them
permanent observer status
Kosovo - Russia will veto any
application
- two state like entities unable to join UN, because one of the P5 does not like them
- but can General Assembly
just vote? the
recommendation is not
binding?
- Seconds Admissions
opinion (1950)
- ICJ said recommendation
was necessary for admission
- Suspension and Expulsion
- Article 5:
Suspension by the
GA upon the
recommendation
of the Security
Council
- Article 6: Expulsion
by the GA upon the
recommendation of
the Security Council
- States have
broken the
UN charter
- no country has
been
suspended/expelled
- reluctance to do this
- League of Nations
failed because the big
powers were not part of
the organisation or left
- UN learnt from this
and built it into their
structure
- eg, South Africa and Apartheid; GA
wanted to expel them, but number
of Security Council believed it was
better for them to stay in so
recommendation never came
- GA could not expel them; condition of
diplomacy, where they had a seat but
could not have a state rep there, so
had no voice
- what about just leaving?
- bound by treaty, you
cannot walk away
from the obligation
- only way to leave is
with a get out clause,
otherwise it is a breach
of treaty
- there is no legal
way to leave the
UN, this is
deliberate
- eg. in 1965 relations between
Malaysia and Indonesia were
bad, Malaysia got a seat on
the security council -
Indonesia then left
- one year later they
resumed their seat
- what would the UN do if
someone properly left?
nothing in the Charter
- REGIONAL
- does not aspire to include the
world, just a section
- only represents a
state in the region
- eg. Article 29, African Union
Constitutive Act (1999) "any
African StateArticle 49, treaty
on European Union "Any
European State"; Article 1, Arab
League 1945 "independent
Arab States"
- FUNCTIONAL
- set up to perform a specific task
in a specific place
- limited powers to
that particular
area
- eg. Article 3, World
Meteorological Organisation
Convention (1947); "Any
State...having a Meteorological
Service"
- members join because they
have something to contribute to
the specific function
- non-state actors
- eg. International Labour Organisation
- comprised of had government
members and half labour
representatives
- Structure of an International Organisation
- vary considerably
- large groups,
compared to
smaller organs
- Plenary Organ eg.
General Assembly - Brings the
members together to voice
cooperation
- Executive Organ eg. Security
Council - Organs that represent
everyone, but smaller and more
specialised, dealing with specific
issues
- Secretariat eg. UN Secretariat -
their own bureaucracy
- Judicial Organ eg. ICJ - dispute resolution
- power relations of internal organs can shift
- UN has weak plenary organ, but
strong executive
- other organisations may vary,
UN is not typrical
- specialised committees
- regional offices
- PERSONALITY
- sum of its parts?
- an organisation distinct and
independent from its member
states
- with its own rights and duties
- personality of the members who make up the
organisation? or does the organisation have a
separate personality?
- do we see them as a club house for states?
where they come to talk about an issue,
then go and do their own thing
- actor in international affairs/law?
performing in their co-ordinated
decisions and implemented in a legal
way
- type of personality varies depending on the organisation
- personality derives from
Constitutional Document
- where their rights and duties can be found
- specific rights and
duties create the
personality
- general personality does not
give specific rights and duties
- eg. Article 42 UN Charter:
Security Council may
authorise forcible action to
uphold international peace
and security
- eg. Article 31, Statute of
World Tourism Organisation
(1970): the organisation shall
have legal personality
- eg. Article 16, Constitution, Food &
Agriculture Organisation (1945): the
organisation shall have the capacity
of a legal person to perform any
legal act appropriate to its purpose
which is not beyond the powers
granted to it by this constitution
- eg. Article 104, UN Charter
(1945): the organisation shall
enjoy in the territory of each of
its members such legal capacity
as may be necessary for the
exercise of its functions and
fulfilment of its purposes
- range of personality, range
of activities covered; some
have more personality than
others
- eg. Commonwealth, closer to
clubhouse; agree to do certain things,
but no one is forced to a common
position
- eg. G20, influential forum,
not much of an
organisation a stripped
form and not much
personality
- Legal rights and Duties of International
Organisations may have...
- treaty making; Vienna Convention (1986)
- can make treaties with states
and other organisations
- international
organisations can
create law in some of
the same ways as
states
- privileges and immunities
in national courts
- can't bring organisations in foreign courts
- take part in national legal proceedings
- they can take part in
national courts
- Field an international force
- eg. UN engages in peace
keeping forces, founded on a
mandate
- they have the
authority to
dispatch a force and
are responsible for
their actions
- Exercise jurisdiction over a territory
- the organisation can
function as a
government and
perform government
functions
- UN has had missions to perform
governmental functions in order
to govern the territory
- eg. Kosovo, is an unneeded mission
- eg. taking on government responsibility, running
the organs, administering government and
responsible for all government functions
- Exercising diplomatic
protection for its agents
- if one of their members are injured they are able
to bring a claim
- in relation to organisations and
their employees
- LIMITS
- Principle of Speciality
- personality of organisation is
limited, sovereignty allows states
to participate in rights and
obligations, wheread
organisations are bound by
treaty, showing a natural limit
- Nuclear Weapons (WHO)
Opinion (1996):
international organisations
do not possess a general
competence, unlike states
- Implied Powers
- constitution contains powers and
limits, which set the outer limits
- potential empty zone,
between powers and
purposes; organisation
could do more than
strictly allowed -
creating implied powers
- original powers can be expanded,
but cannot exceed purposes
- eg. UN has power to keep peace,
but can purpose to send out peace
keeping forces
- Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations (1949)
- UN mediator, killed by jewish
revolutionary group, became Israel's
responsibility
- action was attributable to Israel, and UN
could bring claim
- UN did not have this power; normal was
for states to bring the claim, not
organisations
- ICJ gave more power to the UN, they
work for them so it is convenient
- there are limits of Implied Powers
- Certain Expenses Advisory Opinion (1962): peace
keeping mission to the congo, argued they are the
purpose
- but they need to be paid for and then need to
charge for expenses of such missions
- states said no, they did not want to pay
and are exceeding powers
- Law Making
- significant allows
distinct responsibilities
- Article 3 and Article 6(1) ILC Article on
the Responsibility of International
Organisations 2011
- Supranationality
- basic structure of
international law -
horizontal structure of
each sovereign state (no
hierarchy of power)
- could organisations impose
obligations and create a hierarchy?
- eg. Security Council - Article 42 UN
Charter: Exclusive authority to authorise
use of force Article 25: UN Members
agree to accept and carry out Council's
decisions
- no states have this power, so
organisation has more power
- Article 103: in the event of
the conflict between the
obligations of the UN under
the present Charter and
their obligations under any
international agreement,
their obligations under the
present Charter shall prevail
- this elevates their
supranationality
- Security Council can pass
resolutions which bind members
- Consensual law-making
- eg. General Assembly;
Resolutions are non-binding,
may express states' legal intent
(opinion juris)
- Treaties; states can chose
to ratify and bind
themselves
- International Law Commission -
non-binding codes and treaties
- Other Subjects
- INDIVIDUALS
- human rights
- international crimes
- more specific
- NGO's
- involved in international
decision-making
- eg. International committee
of the Red Cross
- has real duties and obligations
under the Geneva Conventions
- Corporations
- conclude contracts with states
- eg. Texaco v Libya (1977)
- UN Human Rights Council: Guiding
Principles on Business and Human
Rights 2011
- National Liberation Movement
- eg. PLO (Palestine Liberation Organisaton)
- Oslo Agreements with
Israel (1993 & 1995)
- Belligerents
- Belligerents in civil wars
(non-international armed conflict)
- Responsibilities under
Geneva Conventions and
Additional Protocol II
- Sui Generis (unique) Entities
- eg. Sovereign Military Order of Malta
- Catholic Order for Medical Aid (1050)
- completely unique, legacy of the crusades
- has no territory