Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Level 2
- 1.0 Critiques
- 1.2 Metaphors
- 1.3 Critiques Serve
to Assess...
- 1.4 Instructor Role
- 1.5 Critiques Reveal
- 1.1 Approaches
- 2.0 Assessment
- 2.1 Grades
- 2.2 Criteria
- 3.0 Feedback
- Written
- Verbal
- 4.0 Student
- 4.1 Student Lack
- 4.2 Attitudes
- 4.3 Motivations
- 4.4 Behaviours
- 4.5 Students and
their work
- 5.0 Instructor
Personal History
- 5.1 Lifelong Learning
- 5.3 Antisocial Artist
- 5.2 Anti Institutional Artists
- 5.4 Assessment One on One
- 5.5 Bad Instructor
- 5.6 Critique
- 5.7 Negative Crit
- 5.8 Supportive /
Critical Crit
- 5.9 Crit = Feedback
- 5.10 Cronyism
- 5.11 Grades as Motivation Tool
- 5.12 Inconsistent Grades
- 5.13 Grades Not Important
- 5.14 Grades Opaque
- 5.15 Grading Art Contested
- 5.16 Haptic Learning
- 5.17 Honesty
- 5.18 Ideologies Art
- 5.19 Lack of Ed Training
- 5.20 No Feedback
- 5.21 Peer Feedback More Imp
- 5.22 Student Engagement
- 5.23 Teaching as Plan B
- 5.24 Teaching from Experience
- 5.25 Teaching as an
Artistic Practice
- 5.26 Teaching as Taught
- 6.0 Language
- 6.1 Crit Language
- 6.2 Field Specific
- 6.3 Teaching Professionalism
- 7.0 Educational
Training
- 7.1 Ed Training Useless
- 7.2 Informal Ed Training
- 7.3 Institutionalization of Art Training
- 7.4 Lack of Ed Training
- 7.5 Pers. Hist. Lack of Ed Training
- 7.6 Post Sec Ed Training
- 7.7 TA as Ed Training
- 7.8 MFA Leads to Teaching
- 8.0 Pedagogy
- 8.1 Teaching Objectives
- 8.2 Approaches to Teaching
- 9.0 Teacher
Evaluation
- 9.1 Student Teacher Eval
- 9.2 Teacher Evaluations
- 10.0 External
Factors
- 10.1 Administration and University
- 10.2 Artwork vs Art School
- 10.3 Art World
- 10.4 Contemporary Pluralism
- 10.5 Contemp Visual Culture
- 10.6 Digital Technology