Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Procurement
- What is procurement?
- The overall
process of
acquiring
construction woks
or services?
- Factors affecting the selection of the
type of procurement
- Scope of wk: size, complexit
- Programme: start/ finish dates
- Client Brief: commercial/ public sector etc.
- Risk. priority: time, cost, quality
- Current mkt: inflation, financial stability,
availability of specialists skills etc.
- Types of Procurement
- what are the main procurement methods?
- Design and Build
- Design and Build procurement
- what is it?
- where the MC is responsible for the design, planning,
organisation, control and construction of the works to the
employer
- the Emp. sends out a set of ER & the MC
responds with Contractors Proposals which inc
the price 4 the wks
- how does it work?
- when might it be appropriate
- where there is a need 4 an early start on
site: can overlap design & construction
- where Emp wishes 2 min risk:
MC take on resp 4 design
- Tech complex prj: benefit of using MC expertise
- what contracts can be used?
- JCT
- D&B
- MP
- Not so much
- SBC +CD
- IFC +CD
- MW + CD
- NEC
- Options C/D/E/F
- FIDIC
- Conditions of contract 4 plant & Design & Build
- Advantages?
- Single Pt Contact
- Earlier commence on site
- Early price certainty
- use of MC expertise
- Disadvantages?
- clnt find it hard 2 prepare good ERs
- clnt commit 2 design really early
- variations from orig brief r difficult
2 arrange & £££
- Harder 2 compare tenders; hard 2
determine Value 4 £
- ease of fabrication may be
priortised by aesthetic qual
- Maybe less real comp due 2
fewer d&B firms
- how much design
input will the
contractor have?
- dep on amount of design wk
emp already done at tender
- can range from full design (design
& dump) 2 production info and
coordination only
- who carries out
design for the
contractor?
- can b outsourced 2 a seperate design
comp (MC retain resp);
- MC might have in-house designers
- OR Clients team novated
- what is novation?
- a new contract that transfers the rights& obs of one contractural
party 2 a new 3rd party i.e. design rights & obs of arch 2 MC
- if Client DT novated: - make sure there r Collateral
Warranties in place 2 give remedies 4 breach of contract
- if the design team is novated, what should the client put in place ?
- Traditional/ general contracting
- what is traditional procurement?
- design completed by the clients
design team b4 competitive tendering
- MC builds what the
designers have specified
- Appointment of a contractor is commonly by
competitive tender, but less usually by negotiation
- The client has control over design, quality. Generally there is
no design responsibility on the contractor.
- design and construction are separate
sequential processes
- programme for the project
tends to be relatively long
- certainty on construction costs
- contract figure is usually known
at the outset
- risks are balanced as between the parties
- e traditional lump sum approach in terms
of cost, design and quality is a relatively
low risk procurement option for the client
- when might traditional
procurement be appropriate?
- If emp has design prepared
- f design is substantially completed by time of contract selection
- client wishes 2 retain control over design & spec
- cost certainty at start of site is important
- the shortest overall programme is not the clients priority
- what contracts might be used with
traditional procurement?
- JCT
- SBC - Q/XQ/AQ
- IFC
- MW
- NEC
- Option A/C/D/E/F
- FIDIC
- conditions of contract for construction
- Advantages of traditional procurement?
- Ability 2 accommodate chg
- Competitive fairness & transparent procedure
- Inc value 4 money
- Control over design & materials
- Price certainty b4 commencement
- well known procedures
- Direct contractural
relationship between Cient &
designers
- Programme commitment from
MC b4 entering in2 contact
- LAD recoverable if delays
- early cost/ time commitment
- Disadvantages of
traditional
procurement?
- needs 2 fully detail design b4 tender
- if not complete b4 tender -
cost, time cert reduced
- Pro duration may b longer than other types
-its a sequential process
- no input into design and planning from MC
- strategy based on price competition
- dual point of responsibility - DT for
design & contractor 4 construction
- Construction management
- What is it?
- Emp: direct contract with each trade contractors (TC) & utilises
expertise of a construction Manger who act as a consultant 2
coordinate contract
- how does it work?
- TC: carry out wrk
- The construction man (CM) supervises the
construction process & coordinates DT
- CM has no contractural link with TC ir DT
- CM role: prep of prog; determine req 4 facilities;
b.down proj in 2 wrk pack; get tenders; co-ord &
supervise wrks
- when is it appropriate?
- large/complex proj where ads of Cm r put 2
good use e.g. upfront buildability knowledge;
prog advice; specialist input from TC;
- early start on site is KEY
- Flex in design, procurement, construction strategy
- where price certainty b4 commencement is NOT KEY
- where client is EXPERIENCED in construction
- what contracts can be used?
- JCT
- CM/A
- CM/TC
- Advantages?
- prj duration reduced by
overlapping design &
construction
- CM contribute 2 design & prj
planning processes
- roles, risk and relationships 4 all
parties r clear
- chg 2 design accommodated without
paying ££££
- £ may be lower due 2 direct
contracts with TC
- Client has redress 2 TC through direct
contractual links
- Disadvantages
- Price certainty not achieved until last
trade package let
- changes 2 later packages may affect earlier
packages - £££
- Need an informed , pro-active client
- client has lots of consultants & contractors 2
deal with - no single POC - more fees
- management contracting
- Management contracting (MC)
- What is it?
- Man C. appointed early 2 let element of
wks progressively as a series of trade
pck contract (wrk pack)
- MC works closer
with project team
- Man C is emp 2 contrib their exp 2 design & 2
manage construction and is paid a fee
- inital fee and staff
costs paid throughout
wrks
- How does it work?
- C. manager responsible 4 wrks & programme
- MC responsible 4 con wks BUT all physical
wrks completed by SC
- Contracts between SC and
Man. C
- Design developed by client
consultants & construction
commences b4 design is
complete.
- final costs only determined
when last pck let
- MC selects SC through
competitive open book tenders
- Client reimburses cost of these packages 2 MC + fee
- MC role if low risk: gets a prime cost + fee
- when might it be appropriate?
- what contracts
might be used?
- NEC
- option F
- JCT
- MC
- Advantages?
- O.all prj duration shorter due 2
overlap of design & con
- MC contrib 2 design &
planning process
- chg can b accommodated in packages as
not yet let if they have no further impact
- wks let competitively @ current prices
on a firm price basis
- Disadvantages?
- £ 4 wks not received
until last package let
- chg 2 design in later pack many
affect pack already let
- little incentive 4 MC 2 reduce costs
- may become a "post box" sys
- in practice, MC has little legal
res 4 defaults of wks of SC
- Partnering
- What is it?
- A different way of structuring a business relationship
- Involves 2 or more orgs working
2gether to achieve specific mutual
objectives 2 deliver continous
measurable relationships
- project
partnering
- all members of a professional team become
involved in the partnering process at the design
stage (inc MC)
- Ownership of risk is spread between the parties and a
collaborative approach is encouraged to delivering the
solution and overcoming problems
- strategic partnering?
- A long-term relationship for a number
of prj/works that will last over a long
period of time. Framework agreements
allow this and are then implemented on
a project/project basis.
- Framewrok agreement - an agreement between
MC/suppliers/emp. it provides an agreement to fix
the T's & Cs for future purchases. subject 2
inflation
- key characteristics of
partnering
- TRUST
- INCENTIVE; impacts on prices/conflict/disputes etc.
- ADMIN BURDEN - restrict it 2 large projects
- CONTRACTS
- PPC 2000
- Key stakeholder of prj
(client/MC/consultants) single only one
contract
- NEC OPTION X12
- BUT does not create a MULTI-PARTY CONTRACT
- JCT FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT
- stategic partnering contract
- NEC 3 FRAMEWORK CONTRACT
- Strategic partnering contract
- key performance
indicators
- enable all those involved in the construction
supply chain to est. how they are performing on a
project
- What is integrated supply chain?
- objective of understanding & working wholly in the
interests of the project client rather than immediate
client
- BENEFITS
- conflict reduced
- better COMMUNICATION
- better value for client
- improved BUILDABILITY
- better predictability of time & cost
- Measured Term
- in the case where there will not be a tender amount or Contract Sum so
the FA will need to b built up from zero amount to an 'Ascertained Final
Sum' detailing measured and valued areas of the project
- Serial Contracting
- A new procurement strategy which provides an incentive
to the contractor based on performance through KPI
achievement as set out in the Contract. The Contractor
will be awarded with an incentive project if project KPIs are
met and project completed ahead of time.
- Financial Basis of Procurement
- Lump Sum
- contract sum is determined
before construction work is
started
- JCT Contracts ‘with quantities’ are priced on the
basis of drawings and firm bills of quantities.
- JCT ‘Without quantities’ means a contract priced on
the basis of drawings and usually another document,
such as a specification or work schedules.
- synonymous with traditional
procurement methods
- common law: contractor is entitled 2b paid lump sum when
it completes the works (Construction Act gives contractors
right 2 payment by installment)
- Re-measurement
- Reimbursable
- Target Cost
- AKA: share gain/pain
- if cost exceed the GMP the contractor and emp share the
extra cost of the overspend and likewise share the saving is
below.
- INCENTIVE based 4 MC 2 manage effectively tendering & construction process & agree of account with subbies
- Guaranteed or Agree Max Price
- A lump sum contract under which there is no adj of
tender price unless SCOPE req. by client chgs.
- the MC inc add risk
involced in design dev
process in tender price
- ADVANTAGES:
- greater price certainty; MC takes risk of
design dev & unforeseen occurances
- greater control of overspending -
MC interest 2 alert the team to
expensive items of Design Dev
- Quicker settlement of FA
- AKA: cost-type contract (also known as an
open-book contract)
- What is it?
- contractor is compensated for actual
costs incurred plus a fixed fee subject
to a ceiling price
- contractor is responsible for cost overruns, unless the GMP has
been increased via formal change order.
- DISADVANTAGES
- CLEINT pay 2 much - MC
risk allowance may be higher
than in reality
- Scope change are V. £££
- Can b adversarial - trying 2
decide whether changes are design
development or scope cahnges
- Tendering
- Standard rules of tendering
- NJCC rules
- contractors pre-selected on say NJCC basis
- 1. est skill
- 2. integrity
- 3. repsonsibility
- 4. proven
competence &
character
- 5. size of work
- no more than 6 tenderers. If
pre-selection is done beforehand
then tenderers can be selected
on price alone
- good MC have the following:
- recent exp
- necessary skills
- good manage & org struct
- spare capacity &
good Financial
standing
- Single/ 2 stage tendering -
competitive/ negotiated
- Two stage tendering
- ADVANTAGES:
- early appointment + MC work
alongside DT
- suitable 4 large complex sch where
collaboration with MC would b an
Advantage 2 use expertise
- DISADVANTAGES:
- ££ 2 b paid 4 negotiation;
comp reduced
- risk £ can occur as certain
items r not tied down until
contract sum agreed
- Purpose of the 1st stage
- select suitable MC by
means of limited comp
- Purpose of 2nd stage
- negotiated process with the selected
contractor on the basis of the 1st stage
- Single
- ADVANTAGES:
- cost certainty b4 construction
- competative fairness
- well know procedure
- DT under client control
- Public accountability
- DISADVANTAGES:
- slow start on site
- MC not involved in Design - no buildability
- adversarial
- cleint respon 4 DT performance
- difficult to remove contractor in event of non-performance
- reliant on quality & completeness of contract docs
- what is it?
- separates the process with
selecting the MC from the process
4 determine the price 4 the works
- Used when it is desired 2 obtain benefits
of comp and have ad of bringing a MC into
planning of proj and gain early
comencement
- Negotiated
- client has a preference for a particular firm
- used when a MC ha already done g8t work 4 client
- non compitition (lead 2 higher price?) but may b worth it if they do a good job quickly
- Contrac Sum arrived by negotiation
- Compilation of tender lists
- financial standing & record
- size of company
- general experience and reputation in the area of work
- reputation of quality
- Reputation for timely completion
- reputation for claims
- exp of the chosen contractural role
- management structure
- H&S record
- capacity 2 undertake the works
- Complication of tender documents
- What is tendering?
- process of obtaining bids
for construction work
- can b competitive or negotiation
- OPEN TENDERING
- WHAT
- indiscriminate request 4 tenders
- Advert placed in local paper/technical press inviting contractors to apply for tender documents
- Gives character of work
- Deposit usually required to deter frivolous applications
- ADVATAGES
- No charge of favouritism
- gives opp 4 capable firms u might not have put on a tender list
- Should secure Max benefit from competition
- DISADVANTAGES
- danger lowest tender is inexperienced OR has made lots of errors
- No guarantee the lowest is capable or financially stable
- Total cost of tendering is increased
- MEAT = Most
Economically
Advantageous Tender