Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Class Differences in
Achievement (External)
- Social class background has a powerful influence
success in the education system
- Cultural Deprivation
- Theorists argue that most of us begin to acquire the basic values,
attitudes & skills that are need for educational success through
primary socialisation in the family
- Three main aspects of cultural deprivation:
- Intellectual Development
- This refers to the development of thinking and reasoning skills
e,g, ability to solve problems & use ideas and concepts
- Cultural deprivation theorists argue many W/C
homes lack books, educational toys and activities
that stimulate children's intellectual development
- Children from such homes start school without
developed intellectual skills
- Bernstein & Douglas:
- They found that the way mothers think & choose toys
has an influence on their children's intellectual
development
- Middle-class mothers are more likely to
choose toys that encourage thinking &
reasoning skills
- Language
- The importance of language for educational achievement is highlighted but
Bereiter & Engelmann
- They claim that language used in lower-class homes is deficient
- They describe lower-class families as
communicating by gestures, single words
or disjointed phrases.
- Bernstein distinguishes between two types of speech code:
- The Restricted Code
- Typically used by working class
- Has limited vocabulary and based on short, unfinished,
grammatically simple sentences
- Speech is predicable and may involve a
simple word or even gesture
- Is context-bound
- The Elaborated Code
- Typically used by middle class
- Wider vocabulary and based on longer, grammatically
more complex sentences
- Speech is more varied and communicates more
complex abstract ideas
- Is more context-free
- Attitudes & Values
- Cultural Deprivation theorists argue..
- Parents' attitudes and values are a key factor affecting educational achievement
- Douglas found that W/C parents places less value on
education, less ambitious for their children & took less interest
in their eudcation
- That the lack of parental interest in their children's education reflects the
subcultural values of the W/C
- A subculture is a group whose attitudes & values differ from
those of the mainstream culture
- Large sections of the W/C have different goals, beliefs,
attitudes & values from the rest of society and is why their
children fail in school
- Hyman argues the values & beliefs of L/C
subculture are a 'self-imposed barrier' to
educational and career success
- Sugarman argues that W/C subculture has four key features that act as a
barrier to educational achievement:
- Fatalism
- A belief in fate - that 'whatever will be, will be' and there is
nothing you can do to change your status
- Collectivism
- Valuing being part of a group more than succeeding as an individual
- Immediate Gratification
- Seeking pleasure now rather than making sacrifices in order to get
rewards in the future
- Present-time Orientation
- Seeing the present as more important than the future and so not
having long-term goals or plans
- W/C children internalise the beliefs & values if their subculture
through the socialisation process
- Compensatory Education
- Is a policy designed to tackle the problem of cultural deprivation by
providing extra resources to schools and communities in deprived
areas
- Programmes attempt to compensate children for the deprivation they experience at home
- Best known example of this is Operation Head Start in the United States - its aim was
'planned enrichment' of the deprived child's enviroment
- Myth of Cultural Deprivation
- Although it draws attention to the child's
background, the theory has been widely
criticised as an explanation of class differences
in achievement
- Keddie describes cultural deprivation as a
'myth' & sees it as a victim blaming
explanation
- And argues that W/C children are simply culturally different, not
culturally deprived
- Critics reject the view that W/C parents are not interested in their
children's education
- Material Deprivation
- Some sociologists see material deprivation as the main
cause of under-achievement
- 'Material Deprivation' refers to poverty
& a lack of material necessities such
as adequate housing & income
- Poverty is closely linked to educational under-achievement, there is a
close link between poverty and social class
- W/C families are much more likely to have low incomes or
inadequate housing
- Housing
- Poor housing can affect pupils' achievement both directly and
indirectly e,g, overcrowding can have a direct effect by making it
harder to study
- Overcrowding means less room for
educational activities & no room to do
homework
- Poor housing can have indirect effects on the child's health and welfare:
- Children in overcrowded homes run a greater risk of accidents
- Cold or damp housing can cause ill health, especially respiratory illnesses
- Diet & Health
- Howard notes young people from poorer homes have lower intakes of
energy, vitamins and minerals
- Children from poorer homes are likely to have emotional or behavioural problems also
- Financial Support & The Costs of Education
- Lack of financial support means that children from poor families
have to do without equipment and miss out on experiences that
would enhance their achievement
- As a result, poor children will have to
make do with hand-me-downs and
cheaper but unfashionable equipment
- Lack of funds also means that children from low-income families
often need to work
- Ridge found that children in poverty take on jobs such
as baby sitting, cleaning & paper rounds, this could have
a negative impact on their schoolwork
- Cultural Capital
- Bourdieu: Three Types of Capital
- Bourdieu argues that both cultural & material factors contribute to educational
achievement and are not separate but interrelated
- Educational & Economic Capital
- Bourdieu argues that educational, economic and cultural capital can be
converted into one another
- For example, M/C children with cultural capital are better equipped to meet
the demands of the school curriculum and gain qualifications
- Wealthier parents can convert their economic capital into education capital by sending
their children to private schools and paying extra tuition
- A Test of Bourdieu's
Ideas
- Sullivan found that those who read complex fiction and watched serious TV
documentaries developed a wider vocabulary and greater cultural knowledge
- Although successful pupils with greater cultural capital were more
likely to be M/C
- Bordieu uses the term 'cultural capital' to refer to the knowledge, attitudes, values, language, tastes and
abilities of the M/C
- He sees M/C culture as a type of capital because, like wealth, it gives an advantage to those
who possess it
- By contrast, W/C children find that school devalues their culture as
'rough' and inferior
- Gewirtz: Marketisation & Parental Choice
- Since the creation of an 'education market' by the 1988 Education Reform
Act, sociologists have been interested in the effect of increased parental
choice that the Act introduced
- Gewirtz identifies three main types of parents, whom she
calls:
- Privileged-skill choosers
- These were mainly professional M/C parents who used their economic
and cultural capital to gain education capital for their children
- These parents possessed cultural capital
- They understood the importance of putting a particular school as first choice,
meeting deadlines and using appeals procedures and waiting lists to get what they
wanted
- Disconnected-local choosers
- These were mainly W/C parents whose choices were restricted by their lack of
economic and cultural capital
- They found it difficult to understand school admissions and procedures
- They were less confident in their dealings with schools, less aware of the choices open to them, and
were less able to manipulate the system to their own advantages
- Semi-skilled Choosers
- These were mainly W/C, but unlike the
disconnected-local choosers, they were
ambitious for their children
- However, they too lacked cultural capital and found it difficult to make sense of the education market
- they often rely on other people's opinions about schools
- Qewirtz concludes that M/C families with cultural capital and economic capital are better
placed to take advantage of the available opportunities for a good education