Frage 1
Frage
These are other factors involved with the effectiveness of a test: (hint only 6)
Frage 2
Frage
[blank_start]Tests[blank_end] are selected, administered to the class, and scored with the results used to direct decisions on instruction, curriculum, or other educational factors.
Frage 3
Frage
[blank_start]Assessments[blank_end] are only part of the decision making process and use collective data to direct these decisions. These consider background information on the student as well as the answers.
Frage 4
Frage
Tests, because they have no preconceived or biased notions about test takers, can provide [blank_start]objective[blank_end] data that can be helpful in educational decision making and can minimize bias and [blank_start]subjectivity[blank_end] that may characterize decisions based on subjective data.
Antworten
-
objective
-
subjective
-
subjectivity
-
objectivity
Frage 5
Frage
What are the requirements of NCLB? (5)
Frage 6
Frage
[blank_start]Common[blank_end]: Standards are the same across all states.
[blank_start]Core[blank_end]: Address core academic subjects only (math, science, English)
[blank_start]State[blank_end]: Developed and implemented at this level
[blank_start]Standards[blank_end]: Address these only; not a nationalized curriculum
Antworten
-
Common
-
Core
-
State
-
Standards
Frage 7
Frage
[blank_start]High stakes testing[blank_end] came about because of [blank_start]NCLB[blank_end]. The latter did not necessarily dictate the requirement of the former.
Antworten
-
High stakes testing
-
NCLB
-
NCLB
-
high stakes testing
Frage 8
Frage
With the HST model, the sources of data are the [blank_start]high stakes test[blank_end], the basis for decision for promotion/graduation are the [blank_start]high stakes test[blank_end], and the objectivity of the score is [blank_start]high[blank_end] because it's only based on the [blank_start]test[blank_end].
Antworten
-
high stakes test
-
high stakes test
-
high
-
test
Frage 9
Frage
With the report card based model, the sources of data are [blank_start]multiple[blank_end] and can come from [blank_start]other teachers, attendance, etc.[blank_end]; the basis for promotion/graduation can be [blank_start]scores[blank_end] plus [blank_start]maturity, behaviour, etc[blank_end].; and objectivity of the decision is [blank_start]variable[blank_end] because [blank_start]these may be score based or weighted[blank_end].
Antworten
-
multiple
-
other teachers, attendance, etc.
-
scores
-
maturity, behaviour, etc
-
variable
-
these may be score based or weighted
Frage 10
Frage
What is the purpose to have a benchmark test?
Antworten
-
To see students at risk of failure of the HST
-
To test which students need the next level in RTI
-
To add more work for students, teachers, and administrators
-
To properly align with NCLB
Frage 11
Frage
The third tier of RTI is for all students to receive the same information. This may take the form of re-teaching, review, etc.
Frage 12
Frage
The second tier of RTI
Antworten
-
Is comprised of a small percentage of the class
-
Is for students who need extra help beyond the standard
-
Has a plan over a number of weeks with data to track progress
-
Is for students purely not meeting the grade requirements
Frage 13
Frage
One of the advantages to RTI is the implementation as this allows for a unique perspective for schools.
Frage 14
Frage
Why does RTI depend so heavily on data?
Antworten
-
Because accurate and objective scores are needed to test improvement
-
Because the system has just turned students into numbers, man
-
Because the data helps to make better decisions about the education of a student
Frage 15
Frage
Mississippi uses the [blank_start]problem solving model[blank_end] of RTI where each tier is individually tailored to meet the problems of a student.
Frage 16
Frage
A much better alternative to the Mississippi method, arguably, is the [blank_start]standard protocol treatment[blank_end] where each student struggling with a particular subject (or skill) receives the same instruction.
Frage 17
Frage
An advantage to RTI is the possibility of detecting early if a student has a learning disability.