Companion MCQ's: Completing the process

Beschreibung

RDA2 - Qualitative Quiz am Companion MCQ's: Completing the process, erstellt von Róisín Farmer am 02/05/2017.
Róisín Farmer
Quiz von Róisín Farmer, aktualisiert more than 1 year ago
Róisín Farmer
Erstellt von Róisín Farmer vor mehr als 7 Jahre
23
0

Zusammenfassung der Ressource

Frage 1

Frage
Which three criteria are associated with the evaluation of qualitative research?
Antworten
  • Reliability, validity and coherence
  • Coherence, resonating with readers and reliability
  • Situating the sample, reliability and grounding in examples
  • Coherence, resonating with readers and owning one’s perspective

Frage 2

Frage
Which are some of Lucy Yardley’s (2008) open-ended, flexible principles for judging the quality of qualitative analysis?
Antworten
  • Sensitivity to context, validity and reliability
  • Sensitivity to context, commitment and rigour and transparency and coherence
  • Commitment and rigour, generalisability and transferability
  • Transferability, dependability and member checking

Frage 3

Frage
It is appropriate to use member checking as a credibility check when:
Antworten
  • You have used discourse analysis to analyse your data
  • You are unsure if your analysis is correct
  • Your analysis aims to stay close to participants’ perspectives
  • You have produced a theoretical and conceptual interpretation of your data

Frage 4

Frage
You can ‘situate your sample’ by:
Antworten
  • Disclosing identifying information about your participants
  • Describing what your participants were wearing during the interview
  • Providing a detailed summary of the demographic information you collected
  • Agreeing and disagreeing with your participants

Frage 5

Frage
In order to ‘ground in examples’ it is important to:
Antworten
  • Discuss relevant literature
  • Support your analytic claims with illustrative data extracts
  • Provide an in-depth analysis of one, long data extract
  • Ensure there is a good fit between the data extracts and your analytic commentary

Frage 6

Frage
In a 10,000 word report, the introduction section should be about:
Antworten
  • 5,000 words long
  • 2,500 words long
  • 4,000 words long
  • 1,000 words long

Frage 7

Frage
The purpose of a literature review in a qualitative research report is to:
Antworten
  • Contextualise your research
  • Show how much you have read
  • Critique the methodological flaws of existing research and show how you will overcome them
  • Show how your study will relate to quantitative research

Frage 8

Frage
In the general discussion section of a qualitative report, it is always important to:
Antworten
  • Introduce new material
  • Show how your research is better than quantitative research
  • Discuss the limitations of your sample
  • Evaluate the limitations of your research

Frage 9

Frage
Editing a draft of your report:
Antworten
  • Is only important if you have used discourse analysis
  • Is only necessary to correct typos
  • Is an important part of good academic writing
  • Is only necessary when you are not happy with what you have written

Frage 10

Frage
One of the features of good qualitative poster design is:
Antworten
  • Lots of text that tells the reader everything about the project
  • A font that can be read from 6-8 feet away
  • A really fancy font
  • A font that can be read from 2-4 feet away

Frage 11

Frage
A visually pleasing qualitative poster uses:
Antworten
  • Lots of different colours
  • Lots of text
  • Lots of tables and figures
  • One or two background colours

Frage 12

Frage
Qualitative posters are easier to read when:
Antworten
  • There is lighter text against a darker background
  • When text is presented in large blocks
  • There is darker text against a lighter background
  • When all the text is bullet pointed

Frage 13

Frage
Reliability is not a meaningful criteria for judging the quality of qualitative research because:
Antworten
  • Qualitative research is biased
  • Qualitative research is unscientific
  • The findings of qualitative research will inevitably bear the mark of the researcher
  • Qualitative research has limited generalisability

Frage 14

Frage
One of the key quality criteria for discursive research is:
Antworten
  • Member checking
  • Reader validation
  • Peer debriefing
  • Triangulation

Frage 15

Frage
Member checking assumes that:
Antworten
  • Participants are the ultimate authority on their experience
  • Researchers are biased
  • Qualitative research is subjective
  • It’s difficult to produce good quality qualitative research

Frage 16

Frage
Providing a ‘thick description’ to enable another researcher to determine whether they can ‘safely’ transfer your findings to another context is Lincoln and Guba’s (1989) definition of:
Antworten
  • Member checking
  • Credibility checking
  • Negative case analysis
  • Transferability

Frage 17

Frage
Elliot et al.’s (1999) guidelines for the publishability of qualitative research, include:
Antworten
  • Respect of participants
  • Appropriate discussion
  • Owning one’s perspective
  • Appropriate methods

Frage 18

Frage
Credibility checks such as member checking are problematic in discourse analytic research because:
Antworten
  • It takes too long
  • Participants will disagree with the findings
  • The analyst has the best insight into the data
  • The analysis does not aim to capture participants’ perspectives on their experiences

Frage 19

Frage
Some of the problems with member checking include:
Antworten
  • Participants’ reluctance to disagree with the researcher’s interpretations
  • The difficulty of engaging participants in the process
  • Participants’ comments on the interpretations may be motivated by something other than helping the researcher best understand their experiences
  • All of the above

Frage 20

Frage
When giving an oral presentation of qualitative research you should:
Antworten
  • Include as much information as possible on your PowerPoint slides
  • Use PowerPoint selectively to highlight key points and show data extracts
  • Not include any data quotes
  • Only discuss one theme
Zusammenfassung anzeigen Zusammenfassung ausblenden

ähnlicher Inhalt

Stilmittel
Cassibodua
Faust I
barbara91
Analyse und Vergleich von Texten (Epik, Lyrik und Dramatik)
lilith.m
PuKW STEP 6 (mögliche Prüfungsfragen/Prüfungsvorbereitung)
frau planlos
Ausgewählte Dramentheorien im Überblick
Carolyn Li
Globalization
Laura Overhoff
Vetie - Pathologie Fragen aus dem A-Skript
Fioras Hu
Vetie - Histo & Embryo II 2017
Laura Malen
Vetie Mibi 2017
Nour Elassal
Vetie AVO 2019
Kristin E
Vetie Spezielle Pathologie 2022
Alessandro Bertino