110956
Beschreibung
Karteikarten von sammi_taylor01, aktualisiert more than 1 year ago
|
Erstellt von sammi_taylor01
vor mehr als 11 Jahre
|
|
| Frage | Antworten |
| How many pseudopatients from study one were admitted to hospital and what were they admitted with having? | all 8 pseudopatients admitted. 7/8 as sufferers of schizophrenia, other one was admitted as having depression |
| How many tablets were given to the pseudopatients in total? | 2100, only 2 were swallowed. the rest were flushed or poscketed (which was the behaviour of the other patients) |
| What was the range in stay of the pseudopatients and what was the average stay in days? | between 7 and 52 days average stay was 19 days |
| When the pseudopatients were discharged, they were given the label.. | schizophrenic/depressive 'in remission' |
| Did the nurses detect the pseudopatients sanity? | No, the only people who did were the genuinely mentally ill people, saying they were 'journalists' or 'professors checking up on the hospital' |
| Where did the staff stay most during their shifts? | In a glass 'cage', they came out only 11.3% of the time including doing chores, on average leaving the cage 11.5 times per shift. |
| How often were the psychiatrists seen per day? | 6.7 times on average |
| What did the pseudopatients say about the ward? | Very little privacy- no toilet doors, anyone could walk up and read a patients files |
| Some may say that this would create a .... | counter-therapeutic environment |
| Average daily contact between staff and patients was.. | 6.8 minutes per day |
| Results from study three showed that pseudopatients within the hospital who asked questions to staff had the most common response of.. | staff walking past while replying, not giving any eye contact to the individuals. |
| What was the percentage of psychiatrists and nurses that stopped to talk? Of which _% in each group stopped and chatted? | 4% psychiatrists 0.5% nurses 2% stopped and chatted in each group |
| Results of the control condition for study three show | all staff members paused to chat while maintaining eye contact |
| Results from study three suggest that.. | it is the context of the situation that influences judgement and not their characteristics. |
| in study 2, how many patients were admitted over the three months? | 193 |
| How many patients were judged to be pseudopatients by at least one member of staff? How many patients were judged to be pseudopatients by at least one psychiatrist? | 41 patients-at least one member of staff 23- at least one psychiatrist |
| How many patients were suspected to be pseudopatients by one member of staff and one psychiatrist. suggesting.. | 19 suggesting an unconfidence in diagnosis |
| What did Rosenhan conclude from these results? | diagnosis was based on environment not personal circumstances. Results shows diagnosis method as invalid however it is reliable due to 7/8 being diagnosed as suffering schizophrenia. |
Möchten Sie mit GoConqr kostenlos Ihre eigenen Karteikarten erstellen? Mehr erfahren.