1889788
Beschreibung
Karteikarten von Tells Bell, aktualisiert more than 1 year ago
|
Erstellt von Tells Bell
vor fast 10 Jahre
|
|
| Frage | Antworten |
| Wheat v Lacon | who is an occupier? person with prop interest over land etc etc etc - sufficient degree of control |
| Lowery v Walker | implied permission - habitual use of short cut |
| The Calgarth | "you do not permit him to slide down the banister" |
| Harris v Birkenhead | Council was found occupier of house - phys occupation not needed to be liable |
| Greenlagh v British Rail Board | bridge built by stat auth AND p not a visitor (bridge built for residents p was not) |
| Stone v Taffe | Express permission can be restricted by time BUT the manager of a pub had not made it clear that there was a time limit so c still visitor |
| McGeown v NI Housing | no liability incurred for public right of way - not lawful visitor under OLA 57 |
| Simms v Leigh | injury foreseeable but so improbable that no liability |
| Cunningham v Reading FC | d in breach as should have secured concrete so as to not allow angry fans to throw it - injured policeman |
| Glasgow Corp v Taylor | allurement - poison berries in park - d aware but no steps to reduce danger |
| Pearson v Coleman Bros | express permission can be restricted by area but signage necessary - girl mauled by lions on way to loo |
| Phipps v Rochester Corporation | boy fell into trench on open land - d not liable as parents ought not have let young children wander |
| Jolley v Sutton | kids fixing boat on council land - allurement - council liable - teenagers still count |
| Roles v Nathan | occupier gave warning AND c's acted against standard practice - chimney sweeps v boiler - d not liable for deaths |
| Ogwo v Taylor | fireman injured in negligently (by d) started fire - occupier liable for injuries |
| White v Blackmore | "motor racing is dangerous" sufficient warning -successful exclusion volenti not successful here as inadequate barrier |
| Cotton v Derbyshire CC | cliffs seen as an obvious danger so as to not require a warning sign |
| Staples v West Dorset | algae seen as an obvious slippery danger so as to not require a warning |
| Haseldine v Daw | engineer (indep contractor) liable for collapse of roof NOT occupier |
| Woodward v Mayor of Hastings | school governors liable for negligently cleaned steps |
| Revill v Newberry | contributory negligent not ex turpi causa |
Möchten Sie mit GoConqr kostenlos Ihre eigenen Karteikarten erstellen? Mehr erfahren.