CASES OLA '57

Description

Flashcards on CASES OLA '57, created by Tells Bell on 20/01/2015.
Tells Bell
Flashcards by Tells Bell, updated more than 1 year ago
Tells Bell
Created by Tells Bell almost 10 years ago
3
0

Resource summary

Question Answer
Wheat v Lacon who is an occupier? person with prop interest over land etc etc etc - sufficient degree of control
Lowery v Walker implied permission - habitual use of short cut
The Calgarth "you do not permit him to slide down the banister"
Harris v Birkenhead Council was found occupier of house - phys occupation not needed to be liable
Greenlagh v British Rail Board bridge built by stat auth AND p not a visitor (bridge built for residents p was not)
Stone v Taffe Express permission can be restricted by time BUT the manager of a pub had not made it clear that there was a time limit so c still visitor
McGeown v NI Housing no liability incurred for public right of way - not lawful visitor under OLA 57
Simms v Leigh injury foreseeable but so improbable that no liability
Cunningham v Reading FC d in breach as should have secured concrete so as to not allow angry fans to throw it - injured policeman
Glasgow Corp v Taylor allurement - poison berries in park - d aware but no steps to reduce danger
Pearson v Coleman Bros express permission can be restricted by area but signage necessary - girl mauled by lions on way to loo
Phipps v Rochester Corporation boy fell into trench on open land - d not liable as parents ought not have let young children wander
Jolley v Sutton kids fixing boat on council land - allurement - council liable - teenagers still count
Roles v Nathan occupier gave warning AND c's acted against standard practice - chimney sweeps v boiler - d not liable for deaths
Ogwo v Taylor fireman injured in negligently (by d) started fire - occupier liable for injuries
White v Blackmore "motor racing is dangerous" sufficient warning -successful exclusion volenti not successful here as inadequate barrier
Cotton v Derbyshire CC cliffs seen as an obvious danger so as to not require a warning sign
Staples v West Dorset algae seen as an obvious slippery danger so as to not require a warning
Haseldine v Daw engineer (indep contractor) liable for collapse of roof NOT occupier
Woodward v Mayor of Hastings school governors liable for negligently cleaned steps
Revill v Newberry contributory negligent not ex turpi causa
Show full summary Hide full summary

Similar

CASES TRESPASS TO LAND
Tells Bell
Vicarious Liability
cute_kitty_rox
VICARIOUS LIAB
Tells Bell
CASES PURE ECONOMIC LOSS
Tells Bell
CASES PSYCH DAMAGE
Tells Bell
NEGLIGENCE CASES
Tells Bell
Master French
jedimaster3721
foundation of economics
09serukenyahol
The main reason knowledge is produced is to solve problems.
Darrel Hong
Mrs Lyons - Blood Brothers
Harvey Symons
Grammar Rules
Sandra Yeadon