I, Daniel Blake is an independent
social realist film directed by
renowned filmmaker Ken Loach (Kes,
Raining Stones, Sweet Sixteen etc.)
A UK/French co-production,
it received funding from the
BFI and BBC Films.
It became Ken Loach’s largest grossing film at the
box office (taking over $8 million), was highly
critically acclaimed and generated much debate
due to the contemporary social and political
issues addressed in the film.
I, Daniel Blake was exhibited at many film festivals, won
the Palme d’Or at Cannes, and was nominated for many
awards including several BAFTAs.
Social and Political Context
I, Daniel Blake addresses contemporary British social issues
such as poverty, the welfare system and the Work Capability
Assessment.
The film portrays a group of traditionally
underrepresented characters in Newcastle
struggling in poverty to gain benefits and support.
I, Daniel Blake conveys a clear
left-wing political message and
criticises specific government policies.
Consideration of the wider economic context and
concept of “austerity” might be useful in exploring
how changes to benefit policy had been justified.
Much of Ken Loach’s work has addressed similar issues
(Cathy Come Home, Raining Stones) and he is a social
campaigner, known for his socialist political views.
This is important to consider in terms of film production and
maintaining audiences (arguably the intended audience for
this film is educated, media literate and socially aware).
Economic factors
The funding bodies are the BFI (through
National Lottery Funding) and the BBC.
Consider the ways in which this film is funded
differently from many mainstream films,
exploring Public Service Broadcasting and the
respective remits of the BBC and the BFI.
Discuss why vast financial profits might be
less important for practitioners working in
this genre of film.
Processes of Production,
Distribution and Circulation
I, Daniel Blake is a low budget social realist film, funded
by the BFI and BBC. It was filmed largely on location
(hospital, job centre etc.), features lesser known actors
and does not rely on special effects.
Things to consider
Where and how are films and
their marketing most likely to
be consumed by audiences?
How has this consumption
changed/ been impacted by the
ubiquity of online and social media?
Are audiences now more likely to seek out
marketing (e.g. new trailers) online as
active consumers?
How does this impact the
relationship between audience
and product?
The I, Daniel Blake website includes links to social media
and the trailer offers a hashtag (#idanielblake) suggesting
links with Twitter, but it is worth considering the ways in
which the marketing might be more likely to be consumed
in more traditional ways.
Might an assumed older audience be more
likely to see the trailer at the cinema and less
likely to search for it on the internet?
Theoretical Perspectives
Curran and Seaton
Power and Media
Industries
Consider the extent to which the trailer
is a challenge to ideas set out by Curran
and Seaton
The trailer seems to offer an experience that sits
outside the logic of profit and power and may arguably
also demonstrate a level of variety and creativity that
does not reflect Curran and Seaton’s ideas about the
impact of media concentration.
Consider whether the trailer is able to offer a
more adventurous production due to socially
diverse patterns of ownership or (as above)
Loach’s own pre-sold audience.