The ELT Curriculum: A Flexible
Model for a Changing World.
INTRODUCTION
Language is communication, and as teachers we must develop
in our learners the ability to communicate effectively in a wide
range of professional and social contexts.
CURRICULUM:ADEFINITION
Applied linguistics, a similar
definition of curriculum is
proposed by Richards, Platt
and Platt :
a. the educational purposes of the programme (the
ends)
b. The content, teaching procedures and learning
experiences which will be necessary to achieve this
purpose (the means)
c. some means for assessing whether or not the
educational ends have been achieved
The participants within the curriculum design
process:
The planners.
The administrators.
The teachers.
The learners.
MODELS OF CURRICULUM PLANNING
The three traditions
are identified as:
Classical Humanism.
Reconstructionism.
Progressivism.
THE CONTENT MODEL: CLASSICAL HUMANISM
The attraction of the model is that it provides:
3. Accountability
1. Clarity of goals
2. Ease of evaluation
THE OBJECTIVES MODEL: RECONSTRUCTIONISM
The purpose of education from the point of view of the process
model is to enable the individual to progress towards self-fulfilment.
“communicative revolution” and a period of “piecemeal reconstruction”, is now characterised
by “a growing interest in the curriculum process as a whole, attempts to put language teaching
back in touch with educational theory in general and curriculum studies in particular”
Johnson refers to the communicative ‘revolution’, and a revolution cannot
be achieved without a certain degree of chaos before reconstruction
THE PROCESS MODEL: PROGRESSIVISM
Kelly sums:
the fact that neither offers any real help with that decision which must precede all others, namely
the choice of content and/or aims and objectives
THE ‘NEW PRAGMATISM’: A MIXED-FOCUS CURRICULUM
CURRICULUM POLICY
NEEDS ANALYSIS
SYLLABUS DESIGN
METHODOLOGY
Of curriculum planning and implementation, and involve all participants. The primary
purpose of evaluation is to determine whether or not the curriculum goals have been met
EVALUATION
Interaction between the teacher and the learners in the classroom, and on the
teaching approaches, activities, materials and procedures employed by the teacher.
Brindley suggests that two orientations are now generally recognised:
1. A narrow, product-oriented view of needs which focuses on the language
necessary for particular future purposes and is carried out by the ‘experts’
2. A broad, process-oriented view of needs which takes into account factors such as learner
motivation and learning styles as well as learner-defined target language behaviour
Dubin and Olshtain, three areas are central to
the concept of a communicative curriculum:
a humanistic approach in education
a cognitively based view of language learning
a view of the nature of language as
seen by the field of .sociolinguistics
CONCLUSION
The language teaching profession has yet to embrace curriculum
development as an overall approach to the planning of teaching and learning.