categorised mystical REs
that cannot be described
with words as PINT
Passive
Noetic
Ineffable
Transient
Accepted that some REs can be
induced but they still count
It is the change in the
person which matters
Studied clients who had had
REs - said the certainty of
testimonies was enough
there was a common core of
change despite all the differences
Don't need
empirical/scientific
fact because the
subconscious self
is just as useful
Teresa of Avila
Had a series of REs that cured her of illness
Set out 4 stages of prayer in analogy of the
garden
Drawing water from the well
Drawing water from well with
pulley
Irrigation
Rain
Julian of Norwich
Prayed for serious illness at age 30,
got one, had REs which healed her
Sense of unity with the Divine
and gaining of knowledge
eg. visions, voices,
dreams
Visions can be corporeal,
intellectual or imaginative
Corporeal - seeing a form or an image of a person eg St Bernadette of Lourds
Intellectual - seen as an experience rather than an observation
Imaginative - often occurs within a dream
Voices can be hearing the voice
of God and may communicate
knowledge
Can be disembodied, noetic, authoritative
Tillich - two stages: an
encounter followed by a
special understanding
of that event which
reveals a religious
significance
F.C.
Happold
2 ways a mystical RE can be discussed
1. Mysticism of Love and Union
Where a person longs to escape feelings
of loneliness and seperation
We want to be individuals but we
want to be part of something bigger
2. Mysticism of Knowledge and Understanding
Where a person attempts to find
answers to ultimate questions
3 aspects of any mystical experience
1. Soul Mysticism - recognising and contemplating the soul, resulting in soul fulfillment
2. Nature Mysticism - recognising God in nature and realising he is immanent
3. God Mysticism - recognising that your soul wants to return to
an immortal, infinite state with God, achieved through worship
Numinous
Experiencing a sense of the Divine but with distance
Buber - can have a personal relationship with God and
still class RE as numinous. God can reveal himself on a
personal level, leading to special RE of life and the world
Corporate
A group experience of the Divine
Toronto Blessings
Charismatic
Can be dramatic, experience of the
Holy Spirit, feel strong emotion
Features
induced through group prayer
led by a leader - feel presence of God through preacher
embodied by the holy spirit - knocked to the ground, speaking in tongues etc
feel God through their body
long lasting qualities - more piety (devotion)
Conversion
RE that leads to conversion to a religious life often seen as miracles
change in faith/personality. usually dramatic
deepening of faith, sense of peace, connected to the divine indirectly or directly
3 types
intellectual - have greater understanding of God, noetic.
moral - change in morality and behaviour
social - join church/community.
can be conscious and voluntary or involuntary and unconscious
Prayer
experiences
Method of communication between God and humanity
Kierkegaard - can only know God through a leap
of faith which can come from REs. Knowledge of
God can be different for each individual
Scripture
Propositional
Non propositional
Veridical?
Yes
Swinburne
REs are either public or private
Public - normal event
interpreted in a religious
way or witnessing
unusual event with others
Private - explained by normal
language, nt explained with
normal language, ongoing
impression of presence
Principle of
credulity
should believe unless we have a
good reason not to, reasonable
to believe someone's account
Disbelieve if...
Person was hallucinating
under the influence of drugs
do not believe in existence of
God - cannot recognise as an
RE
Evidence that the event was
caused by something else
other than God eg. with twin
brothers you think you see one
but you actually see the other
Principle of
testimony
should accept what appears to be the case unless
there is good evidence against the RE, if the
experience is genuine then it is evidence for God
RE + other evidence
= God exists
Brian Davies analogy of a
Wild Animal: if it has been
sighted once but another
group can't find it it doesn't
mean it doesn't exist
Alston - REs are sensory.
Why shouldn't we trust
our senses when we learn
this way in everyday life?
No
Flew - cannot use Res + other evidence. All
evidence is weak and is like using a "leaky
bucket". Lots of weak evidence doesn't equal
strong evidence
Alston - can't come to
experience God and gain
knowledge this way, may
not inform us about God
Freud
REs are a defense mechanism to protect from trauma felt/repressed in the id, which prevents
psychosis
REs are a result of desiring something that is missing from your life eg father
"collective neurosis" where religion is a safety blanket and REs are an extreme form of
this
Due to lack of ego or projections of oldest and ultimate ideas that people used to
hold
Marx
A societal construct used by the bourgeoisie to control the proletariat - to keep them happy
Happy workers = more efficiency, longer work lives, better attitudes to
work
"opiate of the masses"
Imaginary projection of people's needs and the qualities deemed to be important
James response to criticisms
REs are not authentic because
the God is different in each one
depending on the religion
REs are an expression of
emotion/feeling therefore
you cannot empirically
test. It is the similarities
between the feelings
experienced that matters
Need scientific techniques
Subconscious self is just as
important in making sense
of REs. It could be the
'higher self' that we want
unity with and to develop
REs happen to most
vulnerable in society,
happen to mentally
instable
People who have had
REs are often more
fulfilled and have
greater understanding
of the world around
them than those who
have athiest views
Visions - how can we be sure the voice is from God?
Starbuck
Conversion is a natural part
of human development,
common among 14-17 y/os
conversions
result of psychological causes
Freud - 'reaction to the hostile world'
prone to sudden and dramatic change in life = recreate in mind