Autoclenz v Belcher (2011)

Descripción

(Employment Law) Foundations of Business Law Fichas sobre Autoclenz v Belcher (2011), creado por Matthew Fan el 13/04/2013.
Matthew Fan
Fichas por Matthew Fan, actualizado hace más de 1 año
Matthew Fan
Creado por Matthew Fan hace más de 11 años
62
0

Resumen del Recurso

Pregunta Respuesta
Facts D provided car cleaning services to depots and 'contracted' C’s to worked as valets at one depot Contracts provided that C’s would: (i) be self-employed; (ii) pay own NI contributions; (iii) would not become D’s employees. D requires C’s to sign new contracts which provided: (i) the relationship between D and C’s was that of client and independent contractor; (ii) C’s could engage other persons to work on their behalf; (iii) C’s were free to refuse any work provided by D; (iv) D was not bound to provide work
What actually happened? BUT 1. D told C’s how to carry out work 2. D provided cleaning materials 3. D determined rate of pay 4. D required C’s to provide prior notification if they were unable to work. C’s argue that they were employees.
Ruling Per Lord Clarke at [35]: “whether the terms of any written agreement in truth represent what was agreed and the true agreement will often have to be gleaned from the all the circumstances of the case, of which the written agreement is only a part.”
Mostrar resumen completo Ocultar resumen completo

Similar

Employment Law
Matthew Fan
Employment Law B143 WHOLE UNIT
Angela Dickinson
ACAS
jeyhope.ds
Remuneration policies
amy davis
Employee Status
scrubsizmint
Employment Law Quiz
Kane Paul
Other substantial Grounds -for fair dis
sinead250193
Employment Law B143 WHOLE UNIT
Grace Langton
Employment Law B143 WHOLE UNIT
willie burger
Employee Status - created from Mind Map
scrubsizmint