(1) Why the Conservatives win the 1951 General Election
Descripción
A level (Conservatives, Churchill, Eden 1951-57) British History Mapa Mental sobre (1) Why the Conservatives win the 1951 General Election, creado por Marcus Danvers el 28/11/2013.
(1) Why the Conservatives win the 1951 General Election
What problems are facing
Britain in the summer of 1949
Labour loss control of London
County Council in 1949
"House wives leage"
complaing about rationing
Popular films celebrate the triumph of the individual and
their illegal appetites over the all- controlling state
Resignation threates
Alexander will resigns if there
were cuts to defence
Bevin will resigns if there
were cuts in social servics
Crips, has nerves frayed by
insomnia "ready to resign
about anything"
Bevan spoke of resigning if
defence suffered damage
Labour problems
Economic and financial
difficulties of Britain
Divisions in the party over economy,
welfare and foreign policy e.g. Bevan and
Wilson resigned over the ’51 Budget
Unpopular ministers such
as Stafford Cripps and
Manning Shinwell
“Age of austerity” image
Britain’s entry into the Korean War angered
Labour’s left-wing (highlighting wider Cold War
issues: should the UK support Russia or the USA?)
A decrease in the Parliamentary
majority made it difficult for
Labour to govern after 1950
Conservative structural
re-organisation and recovery
In 1945 General Election, the Conservatives had almost
no professional staff; between 1945-7, they constructed a
list of members, and handbooks for party workers
1945-50: 300 people
qualified as constituency
agents for the Conservatives
The Conservative Party attempted to project a
more youthful image, e.g. Young Conservatives
got underway in 1946 – social and political!
Membership and fundraising meant that
the Conservatives had a membership of
nearly 3m – the biggest of its kind
Just under a million in 1945 to
2,250,000 by june 1948
Democratisation of the Party was important,
e.g. as a result of the Maxwell-Fyfe report of
1949 on selection procedures
Lord Wootton’s “Fighting
Fund” enabled expansion of
Conservative staff and PR
Lord Woolton wanted to make the
party more dependent on a large
number of small subscription
Candidates were forbidden to contribute
more than £25. this was an attempt to
encouage less-wealty applicants
Woolton toyed with the idea of changing the name
of the party but instead decided that the
Conservatives should refer to the Labour party as
the Socialist Party
This tactic was followed until 1959 when it was
discovered that a large number of the electorate thought
that labour and the socialstic were two different parties
development
policy Conservative
Policy phrases such as
“property-owning democracy”
became well-known
Crucial documents as such The “ Industrial Charter
” (1947) were produced as acoherent responce to
Labour’s policies popular on the welfare state. It:
Argued for a decrease in
taxation and expenditure
Placed great emphasis on the need
for co-operation within industry
Acknowledged the role of Trade
Unions in a democratic society
Attacked monopolies
The “Industrial Charter” was followed up by charters on
other policies, including women and agriculture. The
Right Road for Britain set out general party policy
In 1950, the Conservatives agreed to
build 300,000 houses a year, a powerful
weapon with voters wanting new houses
The fall of the Labour
government 1950-51
The events of 1950 were to show
how fragile the British economy was
The year started well with
dramatic improvmentsin
exports, followering devalution
By the end of the year the
new winter of gloom
approached
The outbreak of the korean war in june 1950 pushed up
the cost of commodity prices world wide, producing a
new balance of payments crisis in britain, parly due to
re-armament programme
The trade union were increasingly impatient of wage restriant.
In the summer of 1950 the TUC conference, rejected further
wage restraint and it appeared that the good industrial relations
of the post-war years were about to come to an end
Gaitskell 1951 Budget causted a row in the cabinet.
Bevan and Wilson hotly contested Gaitskell's proposals,
they resigned. This wealened the government
Bevan argued against the imposition of
prescription charges as striking a blow
against the principles of an NHS, free at
the point of delivery