Better for measuring living standards because it
takes into account 3 main areas of living
standards - education, health and earnings. It
measures life expectancy, literacy rate and
GDP/capita and gives a result between 0 and 1.
The results are internationally comparable
GDP/capita PPP =
taking into account
different costs of living
A more appropriate
way of measuring
equality is the Gini
coefficient.
Globally excepted measure, easy
to measure and understand, and
in most cases, higher average
wages usually lead to more
happiness and fewer problems
such as lack of necessities
adjusted for exchange rate
GDP
Gross Domestic Product is the total
value of all output in the economy over
a given period of time. Figures are
produced every quarter
Real GDP measures the value of
goods and services produced within
the economy adjusted for inflation
National output
has to be above
inflation for us to
see real economic
growth
GDP does not measure the sustainability of
the growth. It is a measure of economic
activity, rather than a projection method,
which means it could be due to
unsustainable overuse of resources or poor
allocation of investment.
3 ways of measuring GDP - by
output, income or expenditure -
all should give the same result
PPF
GDP vs PPF
GDP is a proxy measure of
growth - it measures actual
output, not productive potential
like the PPF does
GDP measures short run growth -
fluctuations in the economic activity
(actual GDP) whereas shifts in the PPF
measure long run growth (trend GDP)
The maximum combination of
goods that a country
produces when an economy
is working at its full capacity
% working in agriculture//primary
school enrollment//clean water
access//internet//energy usage
Circular Flow of Income
The outer flow is the financial flow - it is
measured in monetary terms. The inner flow is a
physical flow. The flows run in opposite directions
showing the payments received for the supply of
labour and goods. Each payment represents an
income for another agent.
Firms pay households wages for the labour factor of
production. Households then use this to consumer
domestically produced goods and services
Any income not spent on
consumption is a withdrawal -
savings, taxes and imports.
Savings enter the financial sector
and banks use these funds to lend to
other households (loans) or firms (to
fund investment)
Investment is capital spending by firms to increase
their ability to supply goods and services. Investment
is an injection as it represents an increase in income
in the economy by increasing the profits of firms
Not all flows remain within the domestic economy.
Economic agents may import goods and services from
overseas, and foreigners may buy UK exports. Imports
are a withdrawal and exports are an injection
The value of withdrawals always
equals the value of injections
Y = C+S+T+M -- this shows the uses of income
Y = C+I+G+X -- this shows the sources of income
Link bewteen
income and wealth
Income is a flow of
factor incomes such as
wages and earnings
from work; rent from the
ownership of land and
interest & dividends
from savings and the
ownership of shares
Wealth is a stock of
financial and real assets
such as property, savings
in bank and building
society accounts,
ownership of land and
rights to private pensions,
equities, bonds etc.
Economic Growth Part 2
Economic Growth and Development
Economic development is different to economic growth in
that it refers to structural changes in the economy which
increase the long run productive potential of the economy.
E.g. the internet boom of the 1990s - new
technologies and business models offered
opportunities to firms and consumers
LEDCs face poverty, aid
and environmental issues.
MEDCs also face
development issues, and
have also experienced
periods of economic
development in the past
E.g. the industrial revolution in the
late 18th century when the main
industry (and main employer) shifted
from primary sector (agriculture
and fossil fuel extraction) to
secondary sector (manufacturing)
The late 20th century transition from secondary to
tertiary sector (services) - many economies faced
crises due to painful adjustments
Economic Growth and Productivity
Economic growth does not occur
uniformly across the economy
An increase in
productivity across
the whole economy
would shift the whole
PPF outwards evenly
The maximum output
of food stays the
same even though
the motor vehicle
industry has become
more productive
Productivity measures output
relative to input. In developed
economies, the economic
growth rate is closely linked to
gains in productivity (mostly
labour productivity)
Measured in
output per worker
An economy converts the inputs
(the factors of production) into
outputs (goods and services). The
efficiency with which this is done is
the productivity.
PPF
The shift outwards of the PPF is
economic growth - an increase in
the quantity and/or quality of the
factors of production which
increases total potential output
An economy can operate inside the PPF if there is
spare capacity. Moving from a point inside the PPF to
a point nearer the boundary incurs no opportunity cost
Increases in GDP
Economic growth - long run
growth - increases in the
productive potential of the
economy - shift of the whole
PPF outwards
Economic Recovery - short
run growth - fluctuations in
GDP resulting from changes
in the level of economic
activity - movement from a
point inside the PPF to one
nearer the boundary
GDP may fall if the PPF shifts inwards or
because the economy is making less
effective use of resources available
Unused resources - spare capacity
- unemployment of resources
The multiplier
Explain the size fof the multiplier
using marginal propensity to
consume and apply it to shifts in AD
EVALUATION - difficulty of measuring it - each firm/household does things
differently, time lag to full effect - money takes time to flow through the system -
firms have different business plan period e.g. 5 or 10 years and so they invest
differently, size of leakages - figure for imports but also people keep some
money at home - can only be estimated
MPC = change in
consumption divided
by change in income
The greater the
MPC, the greater the
multiplier effect
Lower savings
therefore lower
withdrawals therefore
more money circulates
Leakages/withdrawals (MPW) -
Marginal propensity to save
(MPS) plus the Marginal tax
rate (MTR) plus the Marginal
propensity to import (MPM).
1/1-MPC or 1/1-MPW
The Multiplier
causes shifts of AD
Governments use the
multiplier to stimulate AD in
times of recession
The multiplier effect can be
positive - shifts out of AD when
there is increased investment
(injection) and also negative -
shifts in of AD when there is a
withdrawal from the economy
An increase in investment or any
other autonomous expenditure will
lead to an even greater income
MUST be spare capacity
to meet demand
A further assumption is that
interest rates remain constant -
when AD is rising the central bank
may take steps to curb the growth
of demand by raising official
interest rates which affects MPC
Economic Cycle
Output gaps are the difference
between the actual level of GDP
and the trend rate of growth
Positive output gaps in a boom,
negative output gaps in a recession
Sustainable growth rate -
ironing out the booms and
recessions (Gordon Brown)
as these have negative overall
impact on living standards
The smaller the
output gap the
smaller the
impact
5-8 years in
between
As the negative output gap widens,
unemployment rises. As the positive output
gap widens, unemployment should fall to
below 0 theoretically indicating a shortage
of labour and a need for migrants
Negative output gap
= spare capacity
Economic growth vs Economic Recovery - both result in an
increase in GDP and therefore both cause a movement from the
current point on the PPF outwards. Economic growth causes the
whole PPF to shift out representing an increase in the productive
potential of the economy, whereas economic recovery causes the
current operating point to move closer to the PPF boundary.
Trend rate of growth
2.75%
BRICS need high growth rates due to their large
populations and because they produce low value goods.
We can grow at lower rates because we have a smaller
population and we produce goods of a higher added value
Germany has the finest knowledge and
manufacturing expertise so they can
charge premiums on their products so
they only need a low growth rate
Determined by improvements in the
supply side capacity of the economy,
such as availability of the factors of
production, capital investment etc. all
things that shift AS to the right.
Unemployment is the
last factor to change
therefore it cannot be
used as an indicator as
there is a time lag
During downturns,
companies streamline
and cut inefficient people
Changes in level of GDP VS changes
in the rate of growth of GDP - Level of
GDP still rises even if the economy is
growing at a slower rate, as long as
growth is positive
Causes and constraints of growth
Benefits of growth
If income rises do
living standards rise?
Yes - more spending,
more choice, more
income for others
No - we have a high propensity to
import therefore no one but
foreigners benefit in the country
If the rich are not heavily taxed, they can
invest more - multiplier effect will mean this
trickles down and everyone is better off.
However they don't do this, instead
they invest abroad, and so the richer the
rich get, the worse off everyone else is.
A 10% increase in income for the rich
leads to a 2% decline in income for the
middle class (1979-2005)
Not taxing the rich heavily creates
social tensions - Labour's 50p tax rate
makes them seem like the fair party
Taxing the rich could deter income
declaration meaning they invest more into
capital so we are better off as above.
It could make the rich move abroad which
would affect our balance of payments
Increasing in consumption, consumers can benefit from consuming more goods and
services, so if consumption levels are high, prosperity will be bigger. Improving in public
services, if tax revenues increase, the government can spend more on important public
services such as health and education, if the quality of health services improve, the
quality of life will improve as well. Reduced unemployment and poverty. Economic
growth helps to reduce unemployment by creating jobs and services and it is very
important because unemployment is the main source of social problems such as crime.
Also there some disadvantages of economic growth, economic can leads to
increase in inequality between people. Economic growth can lead to more hours
of work, it means that if incomes are high, it can lead to people working longer
hours and it looks that, people are unable to enjoy their higher incomes.
We can tackle our existing problems
more easily because we have the
increased resources to do so
If we encounter a new problem,
having growth will make it easier to
cope with, because we will have more
surplus to devote to the problem
Without growth it is
hard to improve
the world we live in
Careful monitoring and
action by the gov can put
right any undesirable side
effects of growth
Economic growth leads to more employment therefore
increased tax revenue means gov spending increases,
infrastructure and public services improve, consumption
increases and AD shifts out more
Spending on merit and public goods
Consumer and
business
confidence rises
Investment and
consumption
increases
Increased
profits for firms
Economic growth leads to higher level of education
and health service. This will result in a better social
structure with a more stable political setup
Costs of growth
Balance of payments problems -
we have a deficit due to import too
much. Also other countries benefit
due to our increased imports of
consumer goods and raw materials
potentially unsustainable
difficulty measuring/changes over
time/costs outweigh benefits?
Blind pursuit of economic
growth often means we ignore
the real problems we face
Interest rates rise to
encourage saving
Income inequality
- increased
relative poverty
Shortage of labour,
immigration increases -
pressure on services
Negative externalities damage our
social welfare and the environment
Could lead to structural unemployment
due to structural changes in the economy
CONSTRAINTS OF
ECONOMIC GROWTH
Absence of capital markets/financial structures prevent borrowing - no investment - no growth
Corrupt governments - e.g. LEDCs - money may not go where it is most needed - misallocation of
resources - majority do not benefit - no better off so no increase in consumption, also no gov spending
on education/ healthcare/ job creation - productivity decreases and output falls therefore GDP falls
Unskilled labour - can only do basic jobs - unproductive - they are needed but they don't help growth
Migration to other countries - brain drain effect - labour shortages - many dependents - slowed growth, Evaluation -
remittances, new skills when they return, job opportunities for those who stay, less pressure on services
War - spending on defence increases - less spending on public/merit goods. Also resources and
infrastructure are destroyed, lots of money needed to restore everything. Loss of life means less labour
Geographical location may make growth very hard due to lack of trade possibilities e.g. landlocked countries
Dependence on imports leads to a current account deficit - not export led growth
Lack of capital markets e.g. until 2007 Ethiopia didn't have a coffee market, but now it is one of the biggest
exporters in the world. They used intermediaries to sell coffee, the prices were unknown and there was market
failure due to asymmetrical information - the coffee farmers had no knowledge of global demand
Improvement in the quality or
quantity of the factors of production
Land
Land reclamation
Discovery of new
resources such as
fuels or minerals
Access to energy - North
Sea oil and gas in 1980s
Technological improvements
in extracting these resources
Use of higher yield methods
Labour
Immigration - larger workforce - increased productivity -
selling more - increased GDP. Evaluation: leakages from
remittances sent home, however there are also injections
from British workers abroad sending money home. A very
small % of migrants do not contribute to the economy - they
give more than they receive
Investment in human capital - training schemes increase their skills
- increased productivity - increased selling and GDP. Also decreased
investment in capital leads to more jobs because humans are being
used instead of machines. Evaluation: 50% of working population
find numeracy hard. The Quality of the training dictates the outcome.
Opportunity cost of spending on training rather than capital. This is
long term - there are no immediate effects.
Migrants arriving
/increases in the birth
rate /increase in the
retirement age
Capital
Investing in machinery -
productivity increases,
therefore GDP rises.
Evaluation: productivity rises
faster, however this won't
reduce unemployment
Capital
accumilation
Innovations in
productive
technologies
Entrepreneurship
Innovation -
Improvement in
technological
processes
Need investment for innovation
Long term
Research and
development
More extensive and
successful training
for managers
China's economic growth
Comparative advantage - taking advantage of
what they have in abundance
UK's growth
The skills of those
leaving school at 16
need to be better
Their backgrounds and poverty
need to be better
Banks aren't lending - QE is not
filtering through - the banks do
not want another crisis and they
are also forced to hold more
cash due to EU laws so they are
lending too cautiously
Our welfare state is
too big and has
cushioned people into
not looking for work
Low confidence level - consumers don't
spend as they are worried about their job
security and investors don't invest
High inflation
deters spending
We have a high propensity to import
Baby boom - women out
of work - decreased
productivity, constraint on
resources, also ageing
population causes
resource reallocation
1990s internet boom,
2000s readjustment of
the value of new
technological companies
To get out of this recession we need
small businesses to develop, but
because large companies like Amazon
are monopolizing the market, the small
businesses get driven out of business
Macroeconomic Policies
increased economic growth
control of inflation
reduced unemployment
equilibrium in the balance of payments
more equal distribution of income
protecting the environment
conflicts between objectives
inflation and unemployment
short run Phillips Curve
growth and sustainability
inflation and equilibrium on the BOP
An increase in the
productive capacity of
the economy
Poverty
Relative poverty
measures the extent to
which a household’s
financial resources
falls below an average
income level.
Absolute poverty
measures the number of
people living below a
certain income threshold or
the number of households
unable to afford certain
basic goods and services.
Macro = the study of
economic activity on a
national or global scale
Large scale processes
which determine wealth and
the mechanisms through
which it can be shared by
economic agents
Consumers, firms and gov
Each behaves in a way
which maximises welfare
- i.e. behave rationally
Consumers aim to
maximise utility
Workers aim to
maximise wages
Firms aim to
maximise profits
Trade unions aim to
maximise the welfare of
their members
The government aims to
maximise social welfare - total
utility of all members of society
Their main tool of economic policy is
government spending, which is funded
by taxes or borrowing. The gov gives
money or services to households and
firms (spending on transport,
healthcare etc) and they take money
away in the form of taxation
HDI INDEX
It only measures 3 indicators of human
development; there is no mention of the range of
products available to consumers, or the condition
of the government/freedom of the people. For an
economy to be developed, the population should
be able to freely make a wide range of choices.
The counter-argument to this is that if there
were 10 different indicators in the HDI then it
wouldn't give an accurate picture of the
change in development, as it would be very
difficult for countries to improve all 10 areas.
The second criticism of the HDI is that it gives an
equal weighting to each indicator, where some would
argue that perhaps less should be given to GDP per
head and more should be given to literacy rates.
This also ties in with the argument that says that the indicators
should be more specific; it's no good having 100% of the
population in education if the quality of that education is bad.
Similarly, life expectancy may be high, but at what cost? Perhaps
cigarettes, alcohol, fast food, fizzy drinks (things people like) are banned,
meaning that the population are healthier, but in no way happier.