Goes against the standards that are set by the social groups
Deviates from statistical norm
Limitations
Cultural relativism
Social norms are defined by cultures
Diagnosis for mental illnesses may be
different in different cultures
No universal standards/rules for labelling a behaviour
as abnormal
Susceptible to abuse
It varies as times change- what is
acceptable now may not be in 50
years
If we define abnormality in terms of
deviation from social norms, we
open the door to definitions based
on prevailing social morals and
attitudes
This allows mental health professionals to
classify people who transgress against
social attitudes as mentally ill
Szasz (1974) said that mental
illness was just a way to exclude
nonconformists from society
Deviance is related to context
and degreee
Judgements on deviance is often related to context
What someone is wearing on a
beach may be normal but the
same thing is not acceptable in a
classroom
What is deviance and what
is eccentricity?
Where's the line?
Social deviance cannot offer a
complete definition of abnormality
because of this
Failure to function adequately
Being unable to cope
If behaviour interferes with life
then it may be deemed as
abnormal and help may be
needed
Limitations
Who judges?
Someone would need to decide that the
person is failing to function adequately
Either the person determines
that their behaviour is
undesireable
Or the person believes that they are fine/are
unaware but others judge the behaviour as
abnormal
Their erratic behaviour may
be distressing or dangerous
to others but they may not
see a problem
Adaptive or maladaptive?
Some seemingly abnormal
behaviour may be
functional for the individual
Mental disorders may lead to
welcome extra attention
Cultural relativism
Defining adequate
functioning is relative to the
cultural ideas of how one's
life should be lived
Failure to function criteria would produce
different diagnoses in different cultures
Non-traditional lifestyles would be seen as failing to
function adequately, when these are normal in other cultures
Deviation from ideal mental health
Marie Jahoda (1958)
We define physical illness by looking for the absence of signs
of physical health, so why not do the same for metal illness
Identified six categories that were commonly referred to in
mental health:
1. Self Attitudes - having high self-esteem and a
strong sense of identity
2. Personal growth and self-actualisation - the extent to which an individual
develops their full capabilities
3. Integration - such as being able to cope with stressful situations
4. Autonomy - being independent and self-regulating
5. Having an acute perception of reality
6. Mastery of the environment - including the ability to love, function at work,
in interpersonal relations, adjust to new situations and solve problems
Limitations
Who can achieve all of the criteria?
According to this, most of us are
abnormal to some degree
They are ideal but how many do we need to
be lacking to be defined 'abnormal'
Are mental and physical
health the same?
Can mental illness be detected in the same way?
Physical illnesses usually have physical
causes, so they can be easy to detect and
diagnose but mental illnesses are usually a
consequence of experiences so it is hard to
diagnose them in the same way
Cultural relativism
Many of these criteria are culture-bound
If applied to other cultures or class groups there would be
a higher incidence of abnormality
i.e. 2 - reaching one's full potential is relevant in an individualist
culture but not a collectivist culture, where people strive for the good
of the community rather than self-centred goals
The biological approach/model
Mental disorder as the consequence of
malfunctioning biological systems
Treatments aim to repair these using
somatic therapies - drugs, ECT and
psychosurgery
Causes
Genetics
Mental illness as a result of faulty inherited gene or
group of genes
AO1: Gottesman (1991) carried out a meta-analysis of 40 twin studies and
found that having an identical twin with schizophrenia gave you a 48%
chance of developing the condition compared to 17% in non-identical
twins showing that schizophrenia has a strong genetic basis.
AO2: The meta-analysis was carried out on field studies giving it high
ecological validity. Twins share 100% of their genes so it is expected that they
would always suffer from the same conditions. The fact that both twins
developed schizophrenia in only half the cases shows that another variable
must be involved. Identical twins are usually treated more similarly than
non-identical twins so family environment may play a role.
Meyer et al (2001) found that mutation
in gene WKL1 showed in seven family
members with a particular form of
schizophrenia but not in six others who
had no symptoms
Faulty neuro-transmission
Neuro-chemical imbalance
The use of drugs that target
neurotransmitters suggest that they are
related to psychological disorders
Increased level of dopamine is linked to schizophrenia
- drugs like cocaine increase dopamine levels and can
lead to symptoms of schizophrenia
Depression is treated with
SSRI drugs- they manage
serotonin levels in the brain
Gama-amino butyric acid (GABA) is linked
to anxiety/Glutamate - arousing
Infection
General paresis is a condition involving delusions and mood
swings, leading to paralysis and death. It is caused by
syphilis and can now be treated.
Brown et al (2004) investigated the link between pregnant women getting the flu and
their child having schizophrenia. They found that women who were exposed to the flu
virus in the first few months of pregnancy were more likely to have a child who
develops schizophrenia than those who didn't.
Brain Trauma
Case study- in 1819 an explosion sent an iron rod through Phineas Gage's head,
destroying parts of his frontal lobes. He survived but became more
impulsive/disorganised, couldn't plan for future and had a strangely different personality
A.K.A The medical model because it treats
abnormality like a physical condition/illness
Biological therapies
Drug treatments
Drugs can be used to change
neurotransmitter levels in the brain.
SSRIs - Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors manage
levels of serotonin in the brain. Research shows that people
with depression have less serotonin than average. They work
by making more serotonin available in the brain by stopping
the synapses taking it up when it's released
Psychosurgery
Brain surgery that involves the
destruction/separation of parts of the
brain
Egaz Moniz developed the 'frontal lobotomy' in 1930's - the
separation of parts of the frontal lobe from the brain
It reduced aggression, made patients more placis but the
irreversible changes may just make them easier to handle. It is
only used today as a last resort for some disorders
Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)
Patient is anaesthetised, injected with muscle
relaxants and has electrodes attached to their head
225 volt shock is briefly transmitted to the brain causing a
seizure lasting up to a minute, a rubber stop is placed in
their mouth so they don't bite their tongue and patient
wakes up from anaesthetic about 20 minutes later
Most popular theory for how it works is that it causes
an alteration in how the brain responds to chemical
signals or neurotransmitters
Patient may have up to 12 treatments total with one or more a week
Strengths
Has a scientific basis in biology with a lot of
evidence that biological causes can produce
psychological symptoms
Ethical as people are not blamed for their
disorders, they just have an illness
Biological therapies have relieved conditions that
were not treated well previously
Weaknesses
Biological therpiees may raise ethical concerns
The effects of psychosurgery are irreversible
Psychological disorders may not be linked to any physical
problem and psychological therapies can be just as effective
without interference to biological structures