Idiographic approach - Psychologists
who take an idiographic approach focus
on the individual and emphasise the
unique personal experiences of human
nature
Idiographic methods of investigation provide an in depth
insight to individual behaviour. This
approach does not seek to formulate
laws or generalise results to others
Case studies - Shallice and Warrington (1970) examined the
case of Patient KF, who experienced a motorbike accident.
KF’s short-term forgetting of auditory information was
greater than his forgetting of visual information, suggesting
that short-term memory (STM) consists of multiple
components. The idea of a single STM component is
undermined by Patient KF, and the results suggest the
existence of a separate auditory and visual STM store.
Unstructured interviews
Thematic analysis
The Humanist Approach
Nomothetic approach - Psychologists who take a nomothetic
approach are concerned with establishing general laws,
based on the study of large groups of people.
The nomothetic approach is the main
approach within scientifically oriented
psychology.
Biological Approach - Biological Psychologists take a nomothetic approach when
explaining psychological disorders, such as OCD and depression.
They typically pinpoint biological factors, such as neurotransmitters,
that are responsible for such disorders and use biological therapies
(e.g. drugs) to treat all patients.
Behaviourist Approach - Behaviourists, such as Pavlov and
Skinner, conducted experiments with animals in order to
establish laws of learning (classical and operant
conditioning) that could be generalised to humans and
non-human animals.
Cognitive Approach - Cognitive Psychologists, such as Atkinson and
Shiffrin, developed general laws, such as the Multi-Store Model of
Memory, which they believed could be generalised to everyone
While the cognitive approach attempts to
establish general laws (e.g. the
Multi-Store Model of Memory) in relation
to cognitive process, cognitive
psychologists also utilise the case study
method (an idiographic technique)
e.g. Shallice and Warrington (1970) Patient
KF and Corkin (1997) Patient HM
Psychometric testing
Lab experiment
Correlational research
Evaluation points
One strength of the idiographic approach is the focus on the
individual. For example, Allport (1961), who was the first to use
the term idiographic, argued that a drastic reorientation was
needed as psychologists has lost sight of what it was to be
human. Allport argued that it is only by fully understanding an
individual that we can predict how an individual might act in a
given situation. This matters because the idiographic approach
has been responsible for refocusing psychology back on the
individual.
One criticism of the idiographic approach is that it is not
scientific. However, some idiographic approaches such as case
studies or qualitative research, do use an evidence based
approach and seek to be objective and attempts are made to
ensure validity. Despite criticism, the idiographic approach
attempts to use evidence based methods and techniques. For
example, qualitative approaches use techniques like reflexivity,
where the researcher reflects critically during the research
process about the factors that might affect the researcher and
participants.
Another criticism of the idiopgraphic approach is the inability to produce
general predictions about behaviour. For example, to allow psychologists
to develop drugs that treat mental illness. Some psychologists argue that
this is a severe limitation. Furthermore, it would be too time consuming
to produce personal theraphies for every individual. This suggests that
the idiographic approach is not suitable for developing psyhchological
treatments and other approaches might be more useful.
One more criticism of the idiographic approach is that it is relatively time consuming. While
both approaches are based on large amounts of data, the idiographic approach is basedon
large amounts of data from one person. Collecting a large amount of data from a group also
takes time but is relatively quicker because the data can be generated more easily. This
matters because the idiographic approach is less efficient when it comes to collecting data.
A final cionsideration id the idiographic approach is that the
disticition between the idiographic and nomothetic approach
is fake, For example, Holt ( 1967) claimed that there is no
such thing as a unique individual and the approach is used
for general principles. Some argue that researchers should
start with the nomothetic approach and can then focus on
idiographic understanding. Consrquently, researchers argue
that both approaches should be used together,