Giddens (1976) proposed
this theory as an
alternative to overcome
the issues concerning
structural and social
action theories.
This is based on a number of assumptions:
People are knowledgeable about
the social world, sociology is NOT
a natural science and there are no
laws of social life, people are NOT
puppets of external forces and
have motivations, people
create/reproduce existing social
practises everyday and social
structure consists of rules and
resources.
Structure and action are socially
connected which is called the 'duality of
structure'.
Rules and Resources
Rules exist in different forms and
resources can be material i.e. wealth or
non-material e.g. social status
How people respond
rules and resources do NOT exist externally to
people. However, they exist internally. Giddens
redefined social structure as a set of rules and
resources which people draw on
However, this underestimates
external social concepts such as
patriarchy and alienation.
Habermas (1987) analysed the work of Marx,
Durkheim, Weber and Mead in order to create
a theory of communicative action. This is
based on the achievement of shared
understanding.
This can be factuall, normative or subjective
Validity of the Claims
Exist in the 'Life World'/ through cultural
knowledge via living in a certain society and
acquiring shared assumptions.
He is critical of Modern Societal
institutions e.g. government and the
legal system.
However this is a
complex debate and one
that neglects the role of
emotions in certain
actions.