Locomotion 1: Form and Locomotion through Ontogeny

Description

Development of form and locomotion through the process of ontogeny.
Connor Joesbury
Mind Map by Connor Joesbury, updated more than 1 year ago
Connor Joesbury
Created by Connor Joesbury over 6 years ago
32
0

Resource summary

Locomotion 1: Form and Locomotion through Ontogeny
  1. Reynolds Number and Body size
    1. The ratio of the density of a medium in relation to 1) inertia 2) Fluid Viscosity
      1. Low Reynolds Number is a dominance in viscosity making the animal limited by the presence of drag
        1. As the Reynolds Number increases the forces within the water alter to more turbulent flow
          1. Importance in Streamlining of organisms
          2. Organism experience Laminar Flow at Low RN
          3. Reynolds number also includes factors such as the speed the organism is travelling and the overall size of an organism
            1. As speed increases so does the RN = Inertia Dominance
              1. As size increases so does Reynolds Number
              2. Drag vs Inertia
                1. This switch occurs around 2000-2500 RN
              3. Swimming with Paddles
                1. Williams (1994) looked at the ontogeny of Artemia as the animal grows
                  1. Artemia go through gradual but dramatic changes throughout their lifecycles
                    1. As the animal grows it adds segments to its body (extra swimming legs)
                      1. In Late development the Artemia have 11 Trunk limbs to help glide
                    2. As the Artemia grew they were within a drag dominated lifestyle
                      1. This then changed to a more inertia based lifestyle
                      2. Developed Trunk limbs which allowed it to glide through the water (using inertia)
                        1. Arms started to beat in a metachronal rhythm
                    3. Jet Propulsion (plasticity)
                      1. Feitl et al (2009) looked at how morphology of Aurelia aurita changed throughout lifecycle
                        1. Shows a very different shape to the common bell shape early on (star shaped)
                          1. In early stages organism is dominated by drag, Reynolds Number change exponentially with as it grows (inertia)
                            1. this star shape has dead zones between Lappets where no water flows, drag is filling these areas
                              1. Cleverly utilizing the forces of drag before the structure becomes ineffective
                          2. Nawroth et al (2010) Looked at how density of water at different temperatures affected devlopment of lappets
                            1. 2 different temperatures were experimented 13 degree and 21
                              1. At high temperatures the bell shape was filled out more - coped with high temp through morphological plasticity
                                1. When brought up in 13 degree water and placed in higher temp water, They showed a lower efficiency in swimming
                                  1. Negatively altered their plasticity
                            2. Cilial Vs. Muscular driven movement
                              1. Stokes (1997) looked at how the morphology of the Lancelet changed over time
                                1. Small larvae were dominated by drag, with these showing mainly cilial based movements (Vicous flow)
                                  1. Later stages have higher Reynolds numbers and swim using an undulating motion
                                    1. See a change in the level of musculature = larger dominance in musculature for muscular based swimming
                                    2. pre-metamorphoses organisms experienced intermediate RN and intermediate viscosity levels
                                      1. in the transitional phase choose to hover and not to swm
                                        1. Why??
                                          1. Possibly too costly to use muscles to swim
                                            1. So as to not highlight to predators where they are
                                              1. Better for filter feeding?
                                      Show full summary Hide full summary

                                      Similar

                                      Applied Marine Biology Flashcards
                                      Hayley Harrison
                                      Impacts of Fishing on Target Populations - Life History Characteristics Altered
                                      Madison Burt
                                      Continental Shelf/Deep Ocean Floor
                                      Jasmine Allen
                                      Marine Biology: Bird Flashcards
                                      Madison Hooks
                                      Supply-side Ecology
                                      chloe allen
                                      Taxonomy Roscoff shore
                                      Salvatore Giordano
                                      Disturbance
                                      chloe allen
                                      Aquaculture problems
                                      chloe allen
                                      Actinopterygii
                                      Jo O'Bar
                                      Biogenic Habitat & Engineers
                                      chloe allen
                                      plant and animal interactions
                                      chloe allen