Mental Health (Care and Treatment)
Act (Scotland) 2003 John Case Study
The Act has 10 principles to adhere to
Informal Care
Every effort should be made to treat John on a voluntary basis
Treatment, support, Care should all be with his agreement and without the use of the law. where possible
Least Restrictive Alternative
John shouldn't be kept in hospital any longer than absolutely necessary
Benefit
Health Professional can only carry out interventions they can show help him
Respect for Carers
Johns mum can expect
Information and Advice
Her opinion to be heard
She can voice her objections to a tribunal
Non-discrimination
Be treated the same as those with other conditions
The Mental Health Act can only be used if John meets the 5 point criteris
Annotations:
That the person has a mental disorder.
• Medical treatment is available which could stop their condition
getting worse, or help treat some of their symptoms.
• If that medical treatment was not provided, there would be a
significant risk to the person or to others.
• Because of the person’s mental disorder, his/her ability to make
decisions about medical treatment is significantly impaired.
• That the use of compulsory powers is necessary.
Only an approved doctor or advanced social worker can detain the person
If it is for a long time the tribunal will have to hear the case
If John is detained
There are time limits on how long this can last
He can have an independent Advocate
He can have a lawyer
he can appeal to the tribunal and have his case heard
He can have lawyer F.O.C to represent him
The law says he can make an advanced statement
He can nominate a named person
The mental welfare commission will ensure the Act is applied lawfully
'The Romans' withdrawal from Britain was a turning point in the development of medicine and public health.' How far do you agree with this statement? (16 marks)