Moral Absolutism and Moral Relativism

Description

moral absolutism and moral relativism diagram
Rachelt
Mind Map by Rachelt, updated more than 1 year ago
Rachelt
Created by Rachelt about 10 years ago
126
2
1 2 3 4 5 (0)

Resource summary

Moral Absolutism and Moral Relativism
  1. Moral relativism-there are no universally valid moral principals
    1. and so there is no one truly moral
      1. Ethical relativism takes a deontological approach
      2. When there's no agreed set of values, relativism can vary attractive
        1. Subjectivism-each person's value are relative to that person and so cannot be judged objectively
          1. All principals and values are relative to a particular culture or age
          2. Culture relativism says right and wrong, good and evil are relative to a culture,to a way of life practiced by a whole group of people
          3. We all make judgements about actions or behaviour as being absolutely wrong in all circumstances
            1. we all make ethical judgements about what we consider to be right and wrong, we all have different views on ethical ethics
            2. An ethical relativist believes believes that there are circumstances and situations in which actions or behaviour that are usually considered to be 'wrong' can be considered to be 'right'.
              1. Cultural relativism says right and wrong, good and evil are relative to a culture, to a way of life practiced by a whole group of people
                1. Individual relativism hold that there are no universally valid moral principals
              2. The problem today is that relativism tends to lead people in to thinking that truth depends on who holds it, or thet there's only one truth. (their own)
                1. Origions of relativism come from Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Sophist and Patagores
                  1. Ethical relativism ; X is accaptable in the culure, suggests universal tolerance, suggests morals are just habits
                    1. can allow justification of anything. Comes from anthology, moves from descriptive to normative. Can allow justification of anything
                    Show full summary Hide full summary

                    0 comments

                    There are no comments, be the first and leave one below:

                    Similar

                    REVISION TIMETABLE
                    v.r.123
                    Epithelial tissue
                    Morgan Morgan
                    Aggression mind-map for A2 AQA Psychology
                    poeticjustice
                    Connected Educators
                    Remind
                    Advantages and Disadvantages of Parliamentary Law making
                    Sinead Gapp
                    English / FRUIT
                    Jan Laxckey
                    Meiosis vs. Mitosis
                    nvart00
                    Plant Anatomy Quiz
                    Kit Sinclair
                    Seasons & Weather
                    MDRay27
                    Immune System
                    dsandoval