R1 --> all modules are logical in order but teacher
colloboration in the course content is missing.
Teacher-teacher connection
R2 --> that seems logical, course content to deliver
creativity should be interesting to the students.
bcoz students's interest is of paramount importance
in the course content
tweaking the course --> theory based
module apporach is needed definitely
and should be a base for the teachers
to understand creativity skills.
Extending the course to PG
diploma --> should have
theoritical background
alongwith practice based
learning that translates into
real knowledge
Perceptions of the course in
relation to the compeittion
offerings
R1--> location is quite important. But more
important is the information services,
module felxibility, course leader support. If
all this go good, then location becomes not
so important
Not every school has the creative thought
behind it. Um, and it’s not just university
..........(include the balance statement)
R3 --> positive for the course content.
Teacher colloboration is number#1
Motivating factors
to continue education
R2 --> getting a job or becoming a promoted
teacher and there are many other ways (courses
cheaper ) to get the creative skills rather than PG
course
R1 --> enjoy working with children, to become a teacher he
wants to study as a qualificational requirement, diverse
skills sets --> to translate usefulness to the children,
choosing particular institution
R2 --> 1. fees 2. course content and location
not important. If course content is interesting i
would never mind
R1--> location is quite important. But more
important is the information services, module
felxibility, course leader support. If all this go good,
then location becomes not so important
blended learning model
R1 -->Module 1 --> possible on
weekends, and other modules
-->online learning is ok
part time learning only cause have work, also prefer beginning of the week, Fridays are busy, on weekend only 1 day