Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism? (Mouffe, 1999)

Description

Mind Map on Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism? (Mouffe, 1999), created by cyndiwang.nju on 17/05/2015.
cyndiwang.nju
Mind Map by cyndiwang.nju, updated more than 1 year ago
cyndiwang.nju
Created by cyndiwang.nju over 9 years ago
68
0

Resource summary

Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism? (Mouffe, 1999)
  1. An Alternative to Deliberative Democracy
    1. Social objectivity is constituted through acts of power( Mouffe)

      Annotations:

      • This implies that any social objectivity is ultimately political and that it has to show the traces of exclusion that governs its constitution. 
      1. For Habermas, the more democratic a society is, the less power would be constitutive of social relations.(Habermas). However, power relation exists, we need to constitute forms of power that are compatible with democratic values. (Mouffe)
      2. de-universalization of political subjects

        Annotations:

        • by putting an exclusive emphasis on heterogeneity and incommensurability, a view of universalization would impede recognition how certain differences are constructed as relations of subordination and should therefore be challenged by radical democratic politics.
        • 去普遍化的政治主体。 墨菲认为,自由主义一直专注于构建普遍性的公民身份(政治主体)概念,其工作以这样一种判断为基础:所有人生来都是平等和自由的,但是,它又使公民身份仅仅沦为一种法律地位,这暗示着个人所拥有的那些权利同国家是相对立的。而去,这种自由主义的政治主体带有普遍主义的特征。而任何普遍主义又必然包含排斥的行为。因此,为了构建一种激进民主霸权,需要一种新的现代民主的政治主体,即去普遍化的政治主体。
      3. Deliberative Democracy
        1. Benhabib (1996): attaining legitimacy and rationality;collective decisions making;free and equal individuals
          1. 1. participants have the same chance to initiate speech, to question and to open debate
            1. 2. all have the right to question the assigned topics of conversation
              1. 3. all have the right to initiate reflexive arguments about the rules of discourse and the way in which they are applied or carried out.
              2. Habermas admits that there is obstacle to realization of the idea democracy, however he believes that : 1. these obstacles are only empirical problems; 2. political questions can be decided rationally
              3. Critique of deliberative democracy
                1. Wittgenstein
                  1. Agreement on language(agreement in forms of life)

                    Annotations:

                    • 语言学是个什么鬼....== For Wittgenstein, to have agreement in opinions there must first be agreement on the language used and this, as he points out, implies agreement in forms of life.
                    • " we have got on the slippery ice where there is no friction and so in a certain sense the conditions are ideal, but also,just  because of that, we are unable to walk: so wee need friction, back to the rough ground." 维特根斯坦认为这种民主模式太过理想化
                  2. Lacan
                    1. discourse are authoritarian

                      Annotations:

                      • the free-floating dispersion of signifiers: it is only through the intervention of a master signifier that a consistant field of meaning can emerge. 主能指是一种象征性的authority, 只有主能指的参与,意义的生产过程才能完整。而这种与权力机制关联的属性,又使得哈贝马斯所期望的free of constraints , equal平等交流无法实现。因此,lacan 的理论从根本上undermine了哈贝马斯的deliberative democracy
                  3. An Agonistic Model of Democracy
                    1. 1. distinguish " the political" and "politics"

                      Annotations:

                      • By "the political", Mouffe refers to the dimension of antagonism that is inherent in all human society, antagonism that can take many different forms and can emerge in diverse social relations. "Politics", on the other hand, refers to the ensemble of practices, discourses and institutions that seek to establish a certain order and to organize human coexistence in conditions that are always potentially conflictual because they are affected by the dimension of " the political" 
                      1. 2. in the realm of politics, the "other" is no longer seen as an enemy to be destroyed, but as an "adversary"

                        Annotations:

                        • two type of political relations: one of antagonism between enemies 敌人之间的敌对 and one of agonism between adversaries.对手之间的“激动”  passion   The aim of democratic politics is to transform an "antagonism" into an "agonism"
                        1. 3. the "conflict consensus"----the recognition and legitimation of conflict

                          Annotations:

                          • a pluralist democracy needs to make room for dissent and for the institutions through which it can be manifested. Its survival depends on collective identities forming around clearly differentiated positions, as well as on the possibility of choosing between real alternatives.
                        2. SUMMARY : Mouffe argues that deliberative democracy (rational and justified consensus--Habermasian tradition) as the centerpiece of democratic process is unrealistic. She presents "agonistic pluralism" (conflictual plurality and non-exclusive public) as more acutely realistic approach to democratic politics.
                          Show full summary Hide full summary

                          Similar

                          Lord of the Flies
                          lmg719
                          Epithelial tissue
                          Morgan Morgan
                          Physics
                          Holly Bamford
                          How did Hitler challenge and exploit the Treaty of Versailles 1933 - March 1938?
                          Leah Firmstone
                          B3, C3, P3
                          George Moores
                          B1.1.1 Diet and Exercise Flash Cards
                          Tom.Snow
                          Repaso de Revalida Enfermeria 2015
                          Francisco Rivera
                          Plant Anatomy Quiz
                          Kit Sinclair
                          GCSE REVISION TIMETABLE
                          Sonia Christopher
                          Improve your Learning using GoConqr
                          Micheal Heffernan
                          DEV I Part II
                          d owen