null
US
Sign In
Sign Up for Free
Sign Up
We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. The dynamic nature of our site means that Javascript must be enabled to function properly. Please read our
terms and conditions
for more information.
Next up
Copy and Edit
You need to log in to complete this action!
Register for Free
686786
Elements of a crime
Description
Criminal Litigation Mind Map on Elements of a crime, created by Natalie Jayne Ta on 28/03/2014.
No tags specified
criminal litigation
criminal litigation
Mind Map by
Natalie Jayne Ta
, updated more than 1 year ago
More
Less
Created by
Natalie Jayne Ta
over 10 years ago
Copied by
Natalie Jayne Ta
over 10 years ago
28
1
0
Resource summary
Elements of a crime
ACTUS REUS
'the guilty act' although can be an act, a state of affairs or a failure to act
A Failure to Act
No liability unless there is a duty to act
Parental/Family Duty
Gibbons and Procter 1918
Contractual Duty
Pitwood 1902
Voluntary Assumption of Duty
Stone and Dobinson 1977
Creation of a Dangerous Situation
Miller 1983
Duty of a Public Office
Dytham 1979
State of Affairs
MENS REA
'The guilty mind' - the state of mind of D at time of crime. Needed for all crimes except strict liability offences.
Intent
Direct
Also called specific intent - a decision to bring about the consequence even if the consequence was not what D desired.
Oblique
Where D may have a specific purpose and is prepared to risk a different consequence to get it.
Recklessness
When D knowingly takes an unjustifiable risk - knowing harm could be caused and proceeding anyway
Gross Negligence
Where D's actions went beyond that of mere compensation and showed such disregard to the health and safety of others as to amount to a crime.
Transferred Malice
Where D has committed the actus reus but the victim differs from the one intended. Offence must be same for victim as intended victim.
CAUSATION
causation in fact
prosecution must show that D's act was the factual cause of the consequence
White 1910
causation in law
where there is more than one cause of the consequence, prosecution must show that D's actions were an a substantial cause
Cheshire 1991
Must be a chain of causation linking D's actions and the consequence. Chain of causation can be broken by:
Victim's own actions
Roberts 1971
Medical Treatment
Jordan 1956
'Eggshell Skull' Rule
Blaue 1975
Any act that breaks the chain is known as novus actus interveniens
Coincidence of Actus Reus and Mens Rea - Contemperaneity Rule
For D to be found guilty it must be shown that actus reus and mens rea coincided at some point.
Continuing Acts
D is guilty if actus reus and mens rea are both present at some time in the chain of events.
Fagan v MPC 1968
Chain of Events
Where the actus reus is a continuing act and mens rea occurs at some stage.
Thabo Mali 1954
Show full summary
Hide full summary
Want to create your own
Mind Maps
for
free
with GoConqr?
Learn more
.
Similar
Omissions
lottelou96
Seriousness & Sentencing
hargreas
Allocation - Adults
hargreas
Bail
hargreas
Allocation - Youths
hargreas
Custodial sentences in the Crown Court
hargreas
Actus Reus
beth1ollerton
Untitled
lottelou96
Untitled
lottelou96
A2 Geography- Energy Security
sophielee0909
GCSE Chemistry C2 topic notes
imogen.shiels
Browse Library